Quote from ElectricSavant:
For how long?...or must he adapt and change with the market? are those averages below?
Quote from worthytwo:
I think this is the "super" level instead of "good" level. Cuz I even seldom heard about people about that level, maybe it is caused by their modesty: they needn't prove anything to anybody.
Quote from Raystonn:
So someone who sticks $24 million in a CD at 5% APY is considered a super trader, eh? The dollar amount made is not necessarily relevant to the amount of skill possessed. A super trader should have a great deal of money coming in. But someone who has a great deal of money coming in is not necessarily a super trader, even if he/she is getting the money from trading.
-Raystonn
Quote from TudorJones:
For a good trader, the ADAPTATION is built in to the system. Thus, no reason to even focus on changing markets... no reason to change based on market conditions, nor the market in which they are trading.
A robust system must be good enough to perform across all markets and under all market conditions with the same parameters. Else, you don't have a true/lasting edge.
Quote from TudorJones:
umm.. how the hell did they get $24 million to start off with? They must've been a hot shot trader once.
It doesn't matter: if someone can earn 20 times the average of the average household income, then they are a SUPERSTAR in my book... daytrade or NO trade.
Quote from ElectricSavant:
Well..
Just because a man is old, does not necessarily mean that he is wise...
I think we need to capture the essence of what trading is...sure the money is the benchmark...but to measure talent, may require an open mind...
Quote from TudorJones:
There is no talent without money Electric. Thus, we must measure money, not talent.