T Turok Nov 20, 2001 #11 >I think you were being sarcastic and if that was >the case, I think that you might want to brush >up on # 3 based on #2. Sure enough. LOL. BUSTED! JB
>I think you were being sarcastic and if that was >the case, I think that you might want to brush >up on # 3 based on #2. Sure enough. LOL. BUSTED! JB
R Rigel Nov 20, 2001 #12 Yes, statistics would be good. I think that would be valuable. It's important to be able to define probabilities. I often wonder "how large of a position should I take on this stock". Statistics would help define it better.
Yes, statistics would be good. I think that would be valuable. It's important to be able to define probabilities. I often wonder "how large of a position should I take on this stock". Statistics would help define it better.
