Quote from gmst:
Mark, Thank you for your time to throw more light on your point 1. In my strategy development, I look at 4 things that outweigh other aspects: PF, Win %, DD frequency and severity, and the looks of equity curve. I typically don't measure the time required for a new equity peak, since I am not bothered about either being emotionally in a DD for a protracted period, nor do I have to report my performance to anxious investors.
peter aan comes to my mind he trades this way and has been very successful for a very long time. it works you have to have a certain emotional ability and i admire that trait. if you can do this then you probably will never have a problem implementing new and different ideas with that discipline ability. i do think that % is the least important item mentioned above. explain latter at end.
I go for typically PF>1.8, % win 35-45%, and very tightly controlled DDs. Tightly controlled DD allows me to lever up the system significantly more. Low win rate however means that I have sequence of 6-10 losses in a go fairly often.
these stats are dead on maybe even too good for the definition of a trending type method. this is the most of what you would expect from that approach. in fact as you approach 45-55% your in swing system territory.
Finally I have discovered something with PF 1.3, and win % around 62%, which will greatly aid my trading by making it more consistent, so that I have higher number of profitable months in a year.
So I wrote above about the metrics I am looking at. If you have any critique of them, I am all ears!!! Thanks.
i hear you on the above 62% but consider:
1.) there is a concrete action/reaction tying percent winners to two methods of trading, trending and counter trending.
2.) the extreme on both ends is very good but as they cross in the middle it gets very profitable impossible.
3.) counter-trending at one end you have 80% winners at $100 each with the occasional string of losers that average $2000 each.
4.) trend-following at the other end you have 20% winners making $2000 each and the average string of losses of $100 each.
{these numbers for profit and loss above are pulled out of the air but the 20-80% are pretty solid as a base.
5.) for a trader doing 35-55% transitioning to 60+% you will be faced with more winners at less profit and less losers larger in size.
6.) for the upside you have the emotional skills of a lion laying in tall grass, waiting for the big kill of the water buffalo.
7.) to gain the gift of flight you will travel light, have little down time to rest because you have to feed often in smaller quantities.
8.) so the percentage of profit is nothing more than a concrete indicator of the method that you trade, nothing more.
it (percentage of profit) serves absolutely no other purpose it's like a stop light indicator. 20% (green = trending), 50% (yellow = swing), 80% (red = counter trend). typically this covers the bulk of system trading types. there are other methods i have left out i know numerous methods. but generally speaking this is what you have.
mark
ps my advice would be to refine what you have and not jump to a new horse, until your so good you don't have to jump to a new horse. that's the time to experiment is after the very successful application and perfection of the existing method. otherwise you will regret getting distracted.