Quote from Grob109:
I look at two efficiencies and how the pair can be coupled.
One efficiency is the one the market delivers on each fractal.
The other efficiency is my personal ability to trade the fractal.
I do two segments of trading with my capital.
For intraday, I use the 5 min fractal and judge the market efficiency as a limit of 3 times the range.
For position trading I use the 30 min fractal and target 10% per natural cycle period. Cuurently the cycle is compressed in time from 6 to 8 days to 3 to 4 days. I target my personal efficiency as 50% of the market cycle range. In these times a 20% range is normal for mechanically screened equities.
There are many many profitable approaches. however a specific paradigm is defined, an assessment can be made of it. It will follow the pair of efficiencies in play.
Quote from cashmoney69:
In the master swing trader, Farley says that stocks only trend, 5-15 % of the time....or some small %'age.
what I dont understand is that, he also says that stocks trend in all time frames.
so if stocks trend in all time frames, then theres a trend for scalpers, day traders, swing traders all at the same time?
- nathan
Quote from TraderFred:
I trade with a very short term horizon to limit my exposure to the market, rarely more than a couple of days. My problem is nailing down intraday trends so that I can trade with confidence. Would love to learn from a successful trader who is willing to throw some "table scraps" of knowledge my way.
MS

Quote from billpritjr:
Just curious
I see quite a few posts about daily tick data, real time quotes, "platforms", etc.
It seems to me that day trading is a lot of work and trend following is much more effective.
I just can't see how daytrading JBLU (for example) would be more profitable than simply buying it long as it crossed the 50-day and shorting it as it re-crossed again. Admittedly, MA's are just one of many trend following methods.
With all the candlesticks, gann waves, Fast Stoch, I wonder if simple is not better.
anyway, just curious