I dont think AAA ever said he could go 60/40 against the vig regularly, no one can do that, that is the reason for the vig, i usually crack .500 every single year, but once the vig gets factored in i am a net loser, i only get paid 1.7 -1 if i beat the spread, think about how this decimates my profits when i need to bet on three games atleast, if i go three games it is 1.7*1.7*1.7, thats only 4.91 to 1 as opposed to 8 to 1 actual odds, that is a monster spread, for my bookie, and maybe other guys are getting better, but the bottom line is it is easy to win 60% of games, it is much tougher to turn a profit, based on 60% win rate based on these odds.
For me the money is in the entertainment, i may not turn a net profit but i dont bet much more than 200-500 per week, so it is worth it for me just to have some fun while i watch some Football...... I never lose a TON more then i make but i have fun doing it, so its worth it.
If you wanna have a fun bet, i will bet you 500 that i can beat 57% straight up against the spread this season......
Its just for fun
I thought of a better idea, lets do it for charity, we each toss baron 500, and the winner between us 2 picks the charity, I dont think baron will have objections to this.
For me the money is in the entertainment, i may not turn a net profit but i dont bet much more than 200-500 per week, so it is worth it for me just to have some fun while i watch some Football...... I never lose a TON more then i make but i have fun doing it, so its worth it.
If you wanna have a fun bet, i will bet you 500 that i can beat 57% straight up against the spread this season......
Its just for fun

I thought of a better idea, lets do it for charity, we each toss baron 500, and the winner between us 2 picks the charity, I dont think baron will have objections to this.
Quote from Dr. Zhivodka:
1) I did not say it was impossible. I simply said that I doubted that he did it.
2) I too am a fan of the run line. It's much more intuitive. And less followed.