How many scientists really dispute global warming?

For anyone tracking at home, the numbers are in and 2009 was tied for the second warmest year on record.

Solar activity was at its lowest point in years.
 
Quote from bigdavediode:

For anyone tracking at home, the numbers are in and 2009 was tied for the second warmest year on record.

Solar activity was at its lowest point in years.

But Dave, it was really cold here for a coupla weeks.
 
Quote from bigdavediode:

For anyone tracking at home, the numbers are in and 2009 was tied for the second warmest year on record.

Solar activity was at its lowest point in years.

And just what record number of years are we using today? Is it for the last 10 years, 50, 100, 1000, 10,000, 100,000, more? I suspect you're talking about a few years, which makes your data meaningless in the overall scheme of things. Using data which is anything less than 100 million years is useless if you're going to try and predict cataclysmic events regarding climate. And that's being generous. Probably should be 250 million or better.
 
Quote from bigdavediode:

For anyone tracking at home, the numbers are in and 2009 was tied for the second warmest year on record.

Solar activity was at its lowest point in years.

Adjusted or unadjusted?

Let me guess, James Hansen pulled his little trick of substituting Sept data for October data.


Global warming is a fraud. The game is over Dave.
 
Quote from CaptainObvious:

You shouldn't attack the OP like that. He was just asking a question.


the idiot made this claim;

"not many. 31000 out of 12000000"


the OP is a fool ... he made a proclamation, he did not pose a question.
 
Back
Top