How many nukes are we going to let NK build before we take them out?

Quote from Lucrum:

UN resolutions? I hope they work better than the UN resolutions against IRAQ.
More...

They are.

First Korea said that if any new resolutions against them were made they would consider it an act of war and retaliate,Obama forced the UN to make new resolutions(Russia and China didn't veto),Korea did nothing

Korea said they were ready for war with the US,Obama said we were ready for war with Korea and ignored them and their threats like the jokes that they were

Korea said that any interference with their ships would be considered a act of war,Obama made the Navy tail one of their ships,made it clear they would be searched when they docked,the ship turned around and went back home

Now Korea is releasing American citizens,inviting former presidents to Korea,and meeting with Richardson in hopes of diplomacy all because they see Obama will call their bluff and they cant push him around like so many of you say
 
Quote from peilthetraveler:

North Korea is obviously building these nukes to attack us. Does anyone have any doubt about it? I would rather not wait until they have 1,000 nukes in their arsenal and start shooting them over the ocean at us before we finally do something.

I would not normally ever say to drop a nuke on a country because of all the innocent bystanders, but I think this is something that needs to be done. 1 nuke on pyongyang and our NK problems are over. It would kill the "dear leader", take out a portion of their army and then the rest of the country is free and would not have to live in fear of him. The military, I believe, would surrender without his leadership.
More...

Without a delivery system, are they really much of a threat?

The 'Lil Bastard is mostly making noise to extort more money from the US.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top