3? 4? 5? How many then it becomes likely to continue?
it depends on the definition of the trend if one has one (usually not)
high and lows may have nothing to do with the trend (again depending on its definition)
3? 4? 5? How many then it becomes likely to continue?
So you qualify a trend when 2 "timeframes" do the "ABCD" pattern or rather impulse correct impulse?This is a posting I made a few years ago.
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...e-biggest-lie-ever.295480/page-5#post-4201408
To me the best definition of a trend and the practical application of trends is best laid out in Dow Theory, but without the confirmation factor. It has stood the test of time. But true, there are other ways to define trends.
No, a trend can be established in a single TF.So you qualify a trend when 2 "timeframes" do the "ABCD" pattern or rather impulse correct impulse?
Most of these responses are ambiguous.So you qualify a trend when 2 "timeframes" do the "ABCD" pattern or rather impulse correct impulse?
Do you try to trade with the trend? Or believe in trends?
That's certainly an original name for a reversal pattern! I like it!!"with-the-brand-new-trend-that-I-hope-has-just-started-now",
You might want to go through this thread and focus on the counter arguments.3? 4? 5? How many then it becomes likely to continue?
%% Amen and agree.I do, yes (both) ... almost all of my trades are "with-the-underlying-trend", defining the trend relative to the charts from which I'm trading. They're pretty fast-moving trends, in my case, because I trade from fast charts, so many people might call them "mini-trends" or something similar, I suppose.......




,,,,,