Enlighten me!
Sure, write me a 2 page essay why I should enlighten you for free. Most people who want something for nothing usually end up being bad traders so maybe I am saving you from yourself.
Enlighten me!
I think there is a lot of BS as far as selling options for premium. Do not take my word for it and I backtested manually, stocks trending in one direction. Implied volatility at times would rise maybe, 1-2% yet, the options premium was moving $2-4 dollars upwards. So, the premiums were rising by a huge amount yet, the implied volatility was practically, static? Remember what a lot of experts tell you to sell options for premium when implied volatility is at the highest. If that is the case, it is quite possible, you would be selling premium when the options premiums could be lower. What happens if it then, runs up since, implied volatility is rising? You would be suffering huge losses in short order? Just because some hacks and trolls say something doesn't make it true!
Sure, write me a 2 page essay why I should enlighten you for free. Most people who want something for nothing usually end up being bad traders so maybe I am saving you from yourself.

It's not a no brainer. 60% win rates and 40% loss rates but you lose 2x what you win.
It can be automated.
The hacks don't *just* say sell when IV is high. They say sell when IV is high relative to what you expect realized volatility to be. The problem is (and I think this is why you see so many people selling this model) is that the market has caught on to this discrepancy and IV / realized volatility is very close to 1 these days.
I should add: I haven't been able to find any significant IV-related discrepancy for any recent period of time that would make it possible to profit off of an options selling strategy. Doesn't mean it doesn't exist, might just mean that I need better scanners.
The scanners you built