I'm confused..You sell naked puts for pennies in great quantity and feel getting assigned or having the stock crater is the best possible outcome??The reason being you can "buy more stock'or sell calls against your long position???
How exactly do you stay in business under these scenarios??
And wouldn't trading spreads from the short side somewhat mitigate tail risk??
Perhaps you misunderstood me--I only want to get assigned on the calls. The puts; I would rather have those expire, but if I get assigned I can ditch the shares commission-free or sell calls on the new position.
I sell way more covered calls than naked puts--dividend income is nice to have, and I make sure I'm well-diversified and never have too great a % in a single equity in case something crashes (except the whole market, but that's another story).
Spreads carry tail risk of losing the entire investment (as everyone here should know by now), whereas it's rare to see shares of a stock go to zero, though it can obviously happen--yes, I got burned on GE, but I kinda doubt it's going bankrupt anytime soon (this is where fundamental analysis comes in). Maxar, on the other hand, is a different story (which is hurting me at the moment, but I'm not panicking). But that's what diversification and risk management is for.
Commissions charged by broker and exchange should be low in comparison with the spread you are paying. For example, if the quote is 0.03 to 0.04, you just lost a huge amount of edge when you trade. You are assuming GE will not go bankrupt but there is no way that you can know it.
So, in regards to this, I have an account on ToS that I use for the tools and price comparisons. There are situations where I have to deal with nickel-increment options on RH instead of penny-increment options on ToS, but I generally try to avoid those and mostly stay away from any bad spreads under $0.10 (If I'm giving up a cent or two on a 0.15 option, it sucks, but I think the lack of commission offsets it? If I was a spreadsheet guru I could probably figure out the exact % on the spreads I need to be profitable). If I'm dealing with true penny options (WFT is a good example), I make sure I can get the right spreads on RH. In general, I try to get good spreads no matter what (patience and good research is a must for me). Unless what you're referring to is that on a full-service platform like IB, I might be able to sell for the ask and buy for the bid (which I haven't considered, that would obviously change the game for me)?
As you said, and I addressed above, obviously there's always a risk of the underlying going to zero. I just try to avoid companies that seem like they're about to bellyflop.
Maybe I should mention that I never deal with index (or any macro) options and only touch individual companies. As stated earlier, asymmetrical information is a bitch, but I feel that being well-diversified is (maybe?) a good defense.
