Its said that most traders trade worse than random, but will the edge obtained by fading them exceed transactions costs?
Eg Trading one ES contract, a newbie might lose $230, but you will only make $200 fading the trade ($5 comms + $25 spread).
On the next trade he makes his 230 back. You fade so you end up losing $260.
Net result he broke even after 2 trades but you lost money.
The only viable way of having this work would be to book the trade yourself. This way you can keep the commision and spread and also book any net losses too.
In the UK you can legally setup a Spread betting company, charge 2x the normal spread and book all trades. In return the punter gets tax free profits (if any) and the UK government takes a cut of the total net losses too via betting duty.
Eg Trading one ES contract, a newbie might lose $230, but you will only make $200 fading the trade ($5 comms + $25 spread).
On the next trade he makes his 230 back. You fade so you end up losing $260.
Net result he broke even after 2 trades but you lost money.
The only viable way of having this work would be to book the trade yourself. This way you can keep the commision and spread and also book any net losses too.
In the UK you can legally setup a Spread betting company, charge 2x the normal spread and book all trades. In return the punter gets tax free profits (if any) and the UK government takes a cut of the total net losses too via betting duty.
