As I've demonstrated on several posts here, the frequency and duration of recessions in the U.S. was significantly higher in the century before the establishment of the Fed than in the century after. Vastly oversimplified, but basically your reason why, laissez faire leads to unnecessarily longer and more frequent system shocks no matter if you're talking about an economy, an ecosystem, or a control system.Every time someones talks about inflation or the central banks, @piezoe magically appears and writes a freaking book (to defend the Elite of course), have you noticed?
Quick example from his post above : "If the Central Bank should decide that blah blah blah..."
Note that he does not explain WHY central banks should exist in the first place, even though our Founding Fathers were clearly against them (for good reasons).
Anyway.
I am curious as to any counterexamples of counties with their own currency and a significant economy who have had better economic success without a central bank?
And why in the world should the opinions of a bunch of farmers and small merchants in a pre industrial revolution, tiny agrarian economy at least partially based on slave labor have any relevance whatsoever on what's optimal for our economy today?