Quote from nell:
Hi Mark,
Hi Nell
I just curious, what market maker do then ? and what is really definition of market maker ? what makes person to be a market maker ?
A market maker is someone who stands in a trading pit and stands ready to bid for any option that anyone wants to sell or offer to sell any option that anyone wants to buy. Today, it's a different world and market makers all post bid and ask prices for all the options that trade in the specific trading pit - by using computers. Those computers are programmed to change the option bid/ask prices depending on many outside factors.
I appreciate your sharing of this, as it's important for me to build my trading journey to make money from here.
Also, regarding IC. I just want to summarize, your opinion it's better to have IC with
1. around 30%-40% credit premium,
2. open it 3 months, close it 2 weeks before expiration
3. targeting around half of the credit premium we receive,
4. risk around 2 times of our reward (2:1) to make IC still alive while market is rebounding
5. Buy some straddle OTM (but i still confuse, do you mean strangle ? because straddle cannot OTM, all straddle ITM)
is it correct ?
1) No. It is NOT BETTER. Nor did I ever say it was better. Collecting a $3 to $4 credit for a 10-point, three month iron condor in RUT is what I prefer. It suits MY comfort zone.
If you blindly copy my comfort zone and trading style you will live to regret it. Experiment. Find positions that are comfortable for you to own. This is VERY important.
A position is comfortable when you can sleep easily at night; when the risk is not too large to make you uneasy; when there is sufficient profit potential to make the trade worthwhile etc.
2) Most prefer to open iron condors with 4-5 weeks to go. I prefer 3 or 4 months. I do not know what you prefer.
I don't like the extra risk (and extra reward) that comes from holding iron condors into expiration. Most traders don't feel that way. All I am suggesting is that you pay careful attention to the risk of such positions and DECIDE FOR YOURSELF when it is comfortable to exit the trade.
3) I have so specific profit target. The sooner I exit, the less I expect to earn. I base my exit decision on risk vs. reward. If I have enough profit potential remaining AND if I am comfortable with the risk AND if the markets are not wildly volatile at the time, I will probably hold a bit longer. I have no iron clad rules. Some traders love such rules. If you are one of those, then it will take some practice and some time for you to discover what those rules are. I prefer to be flexible. But that's because I have good risk management skills. If you don't yet have them, then I suggest being more cautious.
4) I have NO risk/rewrd preference. When I do buy one-month iron condors, 2:1 is not within my comfort zone. I must accept a worse ratio.
5) Yes, I mean strangles. I always own some extra options. Most of the time it is a waste of money. But, I don't care. I add to my strangle collection as time passes or as IV (and the price of options) declines.
It may be difficult to understand, but I am flexible. I have guidelines that I like. You can try those guidelines for yourself, but please don't feel they are cast in stone. This comfort zone idea is very personal.
if so, how is your probability ratio then, out of 10 trades how many you loss based on your experience ?
I have no idea. That's because I do something you must NOT copy. I carry at least 20 different iron condor positions at the same time. Right now, I have Oct, Nov, and Dec positions. If Jan options were trading, I'd have some of those also.
Thus, I do not manage my individual iron condors. I manage my entire portfolio and make adjustment when necessary. I also close any call spread or put spead that becomes 'cheap.' Cheap is a relative term and you must find your own definition. But, I'll tell you this: <b> I never, never carry a position into expiration. If I have not covered previously, I'll always pay whatever it costs to close on Thursday, before Friday morning settlement is determined.</b> Too risky otherwise.
And, based on your opinion are IC is the best consistent and market neutral strategy ? or is there any other strategy that you reccomend for market neutral, especially time like this ?
I strongly believe that there is NO BEST STRATEGY. Period. Iron condors suit me NOW. I use other methods under different market conditions. I like double diagonal spreads when IV is low. That means NOT NOW.
Also, actually I have a concept (about to try it in paper money) to unite directional and market neutral strategy in one portfolio. Because i consider this :
1. Market neutral have small R3 and big probability (more consistent with little money, Directional have big R3 (Risk reward ratio) but not consistent
2. The nice things is, they are always contrary, based on my experience - if there's volatility - that means there's strong trending no matter north or south. and it's make directional most of the time win big, and market neutral loss, this way we can balance our portfolio
3. If the market is ranging, the market neutral strategy win, but we can keep directional on long term or at least take little profit or small loss
I want to try this combining options and future
let's say we have IC RUT (you already know mostly how's stop loss, risk reward, right ? so i don't need to explain), and we can combine buy directional future (long/short), risk no more than 2% our capital, targeting minimum 5x times our risk (if we risk $1, we target $5), from what i learn from the book that teach more of technical analysis and how to being directional, we still always make money eventhough we loss 7 times and win 3 times, and targeting 5x times reward is not hard job even in ranging market.
So the goal of this combination is to still make money at market neutral and directional - and to still make money when the market is not good
how is it guys ? or is there anybody have ever practice that ? pls share it too.
I plan to start again with this combination though
Your plan is okay.
But, it is very difficult to predict market direction. I don't care what those books on technical analysis tell you. Unless YOU (not the book's author, but you) have a PROVEN TRACK RECORD of successfully being able to predict market direction, you are unlikely to succeed.
Why do I say this? Take a look at professional money managers - those who run mutual funds. Most of them cannot beat the returns of the overall market (whatever benchmark is appropriate to this type of investing). If the pros cannot do it, why do you think you can?
But if you want to try, then try. When you give up, you can return to market neutral spreading. I understand the advantages of directional investing. But, if you are not right often enough, it's money down the drain. I wish you good luck in your attempt.
Consider this: If you become a good diectional trader, why bother with iron condors. just make your money trading.
Mark