Quote from IluvVol:
Sounds like you pushed the iron condors especially hard.
I buy iron condors in fairly big size and have done well with them. The main reason is that I do not allow losses to overwhelm profits. And owning a small number of extra straddles - strictly as insurance, not as a profit driven play - doesn't hurt either (but it is costly insurance).
I dont know how long you have been actively trading options, if you ever even market-made options. If you ever traded for a prolonged period of time then you will know that at times such as now the vol explosion can completely rip apart your iron condor strategies. Your gamma profile will look horrid when things get really stinky as they did. You are telling us on one side that with prudent risk management those strategies can be all than a success. You know very well that nothing comes for free,
I've been a professional options trader since 1977, with more than 20 years as a CBOE market maker.
Today, I keep things as simple as possible. I use strategies that are easy to understand and apply. But I also understand that human nature makes it very difficult for some people to accept that they can ever be 'wrong.' That means some cannot accept a loss and insist on holding positions until they 'break even.' That leads to failure.
That is not something a successful trader can do.
Then there is this obvious bit of wisdom (and it is obvious, except to those who need it the most): Not everyone can be a successful trader. Like many other professions, it requires certain skills (which can be learned) and certain psychological characteristics. Some can steel themselves to doing what's necessary, others simply cannot.
Those who lack the necessary attributes to be traders can still be successful long-term investors. But that's a different mind set that still requires either a 'buy and hold' attitude (which I loathe) or discipline on being careful with risk.
why wont you walk us through the risk in this strategy because this would very well support my earlier post. I am not trying to piss on you but you call this a next to no risk strategy
I said no such thing. This is a successful strategy for anyone who can master the skills and discipline required. There is no such thing as a guaranteed successful investment strategy. If there were, everyone would be using it.
and I simply disagree saying this strategy has lost ANYONE during last week. What would have happened if the markets did not snap back, if things would have gone south for another 5-10%?
I cannot speak for anyone else, but for me, I would have made a nice pile of money. My extra OTM puts were coming into play and I would have done much better with further downside than with the reversal.
I saw enough guys getting killed by seemingly low-risk strategies (I am not claiming that a long iron condor would ruin anyone).
Those so-called low-risk strategies usually involves buying iron condors for very small credits (perhaps $0.50 to $1.00) on a 10-point index spread. I agree that that is a very bad methodology. I prefer credits in the $3 to $4 range, limiting losses to $6 to $7. And I never allow losses to reach that stage. When my shorts move ITM, I get rid of the position. Losses will vary, but I never have to ay more than about $5 to $5.50 to cover those (now) ITM spreads. And buy buying in the other side for safety reasons, my loss is not higher than my targeted profit.
Of course, if the options are front month and there is little time remaining, then the gamma is much worse and the cost of covering is significantly higher. That's why I preach and practice not owning near-term iron condors. My goal is to cover everything with two weeks remaining, and sooner if reasonable. I do not need the rapid time dcay (and huge risk) of near-term short options).
I teach that in the book and I believe it's true. As far as advertising is concerned, I provide help here for people who need it - as do others - and I believe my book will be helpful to them. I won't sell many copies here, but I do direct people to my blog with lots of helpful hints.
Problem is the profiles in a strategy such as this one gets completely whacked in market moves such as the one in the past week. Each strategy has its place but please dont tell us that an iron condor would have performed better than a long straddle last week.
Of course I wouldn't tell you that. But, the IC performs better than a long straddle in the vast majority of weeks. For the successful investor/trader, it's the long-term that matters. I'm willing to accept weeks like this - although I consider this week to be a VERY black swan event. I'm willing to take losses when then occur because I know I will win far more often than I lose. And I am not stubborn. if one strategy is not looking good under specific market conditions I move to another. But I will NEVER buy long straddles as a play, all by themselves. I do buy some as insurance. That's for the gamblers and market prognosticators. It's not for me. It's not for long term winners - unless one has the skill to find options that are significantly undervalued and which do not remain undervalued for long. I'll leave that play to you, as I lack he skill to find those opportunities. And it's surely a skill that the vast majority lacks.
I dont see a lot of use for iron condors as stand-alone strategies (it can be a great net profile for a whole options book if employed in the right environment), a multiple of the little you make on those can be taken away in market moves such as last week.
That's where you simply don't get it. No one in his right mind would buy a 10-point iron condor for what you call 'the little you make.' I get dollars for my iron condors. i know people who consider my $3+ to be too little and they prefer to collect get $5+ for their iron condors. I don't like that style, but there's something about iron condor buying that's suitable for a lot of traders. And successful ones. I believe (yes, I preach it in the book) that the trader/investor must always remain within his/her individual comfort zone. that means owning a portfolio of positions for which the risk and eward are both acceptable.
Your problem is that you are confusing an educator (that's me) with the hypesters who claim 80-90% winning trades. Yes, those are the ones who adopt risky iron condors. They sell options with 4-5 delta and win almost all the time. They can survive, but only with good risk management skills, which I suspect they lack. I don't like their methods either and specifically recommend against it.
Mark