%%Ever hear company called Enron? Do you think each ten bucks down would be a better buy?
Long term stocks I have backtested them 25 plus years, day trading 10 plus years, this is only confident way to know the answers you seek, not asking members. Stocks are not like the ES, they trend till they don't trend, when they go down, trend either neutral or down trend. But really has much to do with your back testing and Trading Plan. I will average down in overall stock position, but each stocks has different percentage down I will do and I use options to add to a position. In stocks I look at averaging down as defensive move unlike scalping ES. But I would recommend just take the loss and find something else. You can always hedge the Long Stock position and do Put Debit spread to help cover possible stock losses, if stock goes up, sell the long Put and keep the short put trying recover losses on long Put.
If long, then the min low of the previous two bars is my stop, vice versa for short. Pick the best entries consistent with that stop condition. Take whatever profit presents itself before it evaporates too much, don't hold out for preset arbitrary targets.I've been always wondering how to cut losses, I know I should do what the market tells me to do, I'm not looking for that kind of answers. Here is the scenario:
Assume I buy reversal according to oversold and a few other indicators (or other trading strategies), I had a good setup and entered a long position, but the price continued dropping and my loss had reached my maximum loss per trade, I should close my position according to my trading rules. But, on the other hand, it's more oversold and I have a even better setup, I should buy more instead of cutting losses. This is a dilemma.
What do you do and why?
Very good system and almost always profitable trades.
But there is one small problem: you should be able to define with almost 100% accuracy if it is a retracement and not a change of direction.
On the other hand you always have that problem, even if you wait till the direction changes, or at least you THINK it is changing direction...
I think that statistically there are more retracements then direction changes, because, if not, it would mean that retracements would not exist. So that's already in favor for retracement buying.
I can work out the direction of current/future trend on FX market nearly perfectly ... but that's still not good enough if I can't find the optimal entry...my loss now comes from the stop loss that I set. Now I am trying hard to find optimal entry/exit ...I don't like bearing too much risk even if that's called discipline...maybe I am still too naive or I might be missing something...although one thing I have found out is that I am not a full time trader, I study and work as well and cannot commit to trading long hours when trading requires a lot of patience for an optimal entry/exit; this is the difference between trading and game; now I work hard to find a good fishing spot to set limited order rather than just initiate market order with stop loss.
What timeframe are you using for FX and which currencies?
Are you targeting a profit or letting it run?
How much back testing have you done? In other words, what has your back testing have proved to show you a "nearly perfect"?
Most are unaware that the entry is often least of your concerns.
I use daily timeframe to guess the current/future trend.
1 minute, 15 minutes, 30 minutes to monitor how the current trend develops.
1 H/daily moving average to find daily resistance/support level.
I target a profit so I work out the destination and most of the time daily closing price is happen to be my destination.
Maybe I was premature to say 'nearly perfect' although it's not so difficult to work out the current/future direction on FX market now. I sometimes trade EUR pairs but mostly, I trade GBP pairs cos it provides the best volatility for smaller traders.
I use the price action and TA ,but I don't do the backtesting...sometimes I do research and have just downloaded some GBPUSD data from Thomson Reuter to carry out research on optimal entry/exit points with SAS programming.