My main style of trading is discretionary based on fundamentals. I use TA for entry and sometimes exit. Be a discretionary trader its hard to back test markets I know the future of (or past future…).
there's a good possibility that they use support and resistance for their exit strategy rather than pulling numbers out of their ass.I know my stop and my target but both numbers are pulled out of my ass. I read about successful traders and their “high probability” trades and I’m curious how they figure the probability.
My main style of trading is discretionary based on fundamentals. I use TA for entry and sometimes exit. Be a discretionary trader its hard to back test markets I know the future of (or past future…).
I’m looking to refine my game. I need to start filtering my trades by risk/reward and probability. I have no idea how to do this. Any advice? Any reading recommendations?
I’m looking to refine my game. I need to start filtering my trades by risk/reward and probability. I have no idea how to do this. Any advice? Any reading recommendations?
The calculation of risk/reward and probabilities when talking about the underlying instrument is always going to have huge error margins.
Using options to calculate risk/reward and probabilities is more straightforward. Although using options still have error margins in the calculations because of assumptions about market movements, such as price change distributions being normally distributed.
One example, see attached.
%%I’m looking to refine my game. I need to start filtering my trades by risk/reward and probability. I have no idea how to do this. Any advice? Any reading recommendations?

My main style of trading is discretionary based on fundamentals. I use TA for entry and sometimes exit. Be a discretionary trader its hard to back test markets I know the future of (or past future…).
Unless your entry is completely mechanical and can be back-tested programmatically, you pretty much need to do this manually bar-by-bar on historical charts and take notes/statistics systematically.
And yes. It's a lot of work.