Yes that is correct. The advantage of cloning has over imaging is that with cloning you dont need to do a restore step because you have a perfect copy of the original drive already sitting on the clone drive. If your system is configured correctly you should be able to change you BIOS boot order and immediately boot into the clone drive. I don't know if your situation requires that kind of speed versus having to take the time to restore the backup image. Luckily I have never had to do a full image restore (knock on wood) so for me the speed isnt as crucial because I dont plan on having to do it often and I have other systems I can use if one goes down.Quote from hcour:
Thanks for bringing up imaging. I looked into it a bit and maybe you're right, that might be a better way to go, but I'm unclear exactly what imaging actually is. If I backup the whole drive and then restore that, it's basically like reverting to that previous backup point, correct?
Yes, exactly.Quote from hcour:
Acronis creates a bootable cd which boots right into their program, which is sweet. So say some program or virus or whatever completely screws up Windows, then I would boot into the Acronis cd and choose to restore the whole partition, right? And this would restore it just like it was at the backup point before things went bad. Do I understand it correctly?
Yep, that is the advantage, you can store multiple images (because of the compression) in the same space that a single clone drive would require.Quote from hcour:
This would be nice, because I could have several different images on the backup disk, like maybe every few days, so I could revert to yesterday, or 3 days ago, or a wk ago, right?
Having several backups is definitely a good idea in case you don't notice that you permanently deleted an important file for a week or two. Also you dont have to do a full image restore, you can mount the backup image as a drive letter and then browse and restore select files if you need to. Its very nice.