It's quite simple. A third party needs to be created.
while the existing parties are being destroyed
It's quite simple. A third party needs to be created.
I think you have it wrong, as a lot, if not most of the "gunfucking nutjobs" tend to come from liberal groups. But I don't expect facts will ever get in your way.
"We survived her husband and Obama, we can survive her. "
You're maturing.
... .
You have the right to free speech with your politician as well. Call your Senator and Congressman and set up an appointment and use that same free speech!!
%%%%%%%%%%I think tea party groups should form a coalition and then create one website with this message... you are either with us or we vote against you and run a third party candidate.
On that site they note that if a in order to not face a third party challenger that must.
the list could include the following
1. vote to defund obamacare
2. vote to seal the border completely
3. no amnesty negotiations until the border is sealed
4. cap federal spending.
5. lower income taxes to 15% or lower.
6. drill or increase our security through useful energy development
7. support coal for now.
it seems hopeless. Plus, as 666 observes, it would likely hand democrats more victories.
Lately, I have to say I am reconsidering. The republican establishment seems to be at war with their presumed constituents. We are seeing a reemergence of the eastern liberal country club republicans,eg Christie, Romney, Boehner, Ryan, etal. These guys could easily be moderate democrats, but for the fact the democrat party does not allow any moderates now. It is one thing to have differences within a caucus. It offends me when they actively work to undermine a competing party faction however.
Boehner Decides Helping Hillary Win Is Better Than Passing Immigration Reform.
At the start of 2013, I really thought immigration reform was going to happen. Unlike every Obama-supported initiative that Republicans had opposed, the cold political logic of cooperation was obvious: Republicans would alleviate their crippling weakness with Latino voters while Obama would gain a major policy accomplishment. The only real loser in the deal would be the 2016 Democratic presidential candidate, who would lose a powerful issue, but Hillary Clinton was not going to be in the room when the deal was cut.
It didnât happen. The failure of the House to pass a bill of any kind represents a fascinating case study of a party unable to act on its recognized political self-interest. This was not like, say, the stimulus, where the GOPâs short- and long-term goals were clearly served by total opposition to any bill that would lessen economic pain. It was not even like health care, where Republicans traded away a chance to influence health-care policy in order to reap the immediate political benefits of polarized opposition. Here are four thoughts on a self-inflicted wound:
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/07/boehner-helps-hillary-kills-immigration-reform.html
WTF right do a bunch of invaders from central america have to"un-rig" our country, you un-American puddle of diarrhea? Maybe "thinking" that "the system" is rigged helps you feel better about what a miserable failure your life has been?It's a real bind for our plutocrats, and their republican lackies. But Clinton is clearly going to be less of a threat to their privilege, than that posed by the admission of tens or hundreds of thousands of voting immigrants who might dare trying to un-rig the system.
.How Do We Deal With Guys Like Thad Cochran?