Quote from HowardCohodas:
jack hershey,
You seemed to have hijacked my response to a paragraph from an earlier post to an end that I cannot fathom. I can't figure out what point you are trying to make or how it relates to the original paragraph.
__________________
Author - "These Seven Trading (Investing) Secrets Will Explode Your Account: All I Know About Trading (Investing) I Learned in Flight School"
Experiencing success is measured by what, how and why a person used given tools to become filthy rich.
Wiliam J O'Neil represents the fast track to riches.
Review his institutional package that originally rented for 44K a year when it came out of beta. His approach is totally canned.
I am just making the point that being a successful trader is a 6 month trip and it doe not have anything to do with stats and guessing to bet.
In fifteen minutes a person can use any drag and drop to have a routine that tests at a 60 plus Sharpe ratio for trading stocks. NO indicators are used in the drag and drop.
Instead carnap's logic theory is used with repsect to price and volume.
The meausres are binary. Gerunds in the English language.
you recommend the CW path of the financial industry. It does not "beat the averages" as the financial industry reports to all of us.
On the other hand, a person can use the market's offer as a standard and extract the offer using non probabilistic information theory.
Now to consider hijacking.
You may want to reconsider your orientation and comment.
You are broadening the definition of hijacking. A point by poiiunt repsonse to a post (yours) by me does not make me a hijacker, in just my opinion.
Here in ET when I hijack a thread I literally take it over and control all the thoughts of interest in that thread.
Here in this thread I only presented, previously, some easy measures of success.
Your post made several points that are the fodder of CW in the financial industry. I just posted the "workarounds" to avoid foregoing "success in trading".
Trading intraday in markets involves a "taking". What is taken is a multiple of the daily range. One rule is used: stay on the correct side of the market.
For me in the ES this is 25 to 40 trades a day. considering the daily range; it wold be difficult to make less than a multiple of the daily range when staying on the correct sideof the market segment by segmentof profits.
I use a check off log.
One column is foe sentiment. Another column is for continuation or change. C is change and X is contiuataion.
A set of four gerunds describes the two market variables. This is two hypotheses that pair the leading veriable of price and price.
Arrows are used to record the gerunds for the leading variable of price. X and C are used for price trending.
See if you find anything unique or original or probabilistic in my notes above. If you do not, then you can conclude I do not see the need for any statisticulating for trading nor making money.
Consider the doji. Consider the ends of bars in terms of extremes.
The binary vector is the key to making money trading. Use leading variables of price to trade price.
For change I keep[ a checkoff of peaks and troughs of volume.
Trends have onlt one pattern in markets. there is a correspondence of three price moves to four volume events.
To contain three price moves you need four ends. Volume states these ends in advance of the price moves.
QED.
You will know when I am hijacking a thread. I do not hijack posts i a thread; I just make point by point comments sometimes when the poster is way off topic. Here the topic is success and what measures or provides success.
Please put me on ignore to better solve your situation. I'm what you may call "bad news".