How do famous swing traders like Dan Zanger size up so fast?

They are all over youtube, even your apostle fully monetizes his claimed (unproven) success story through his website, merchandise,... Someone who "easily" made a hundred million in a few years does not bother selling merchandise or charges for an education subscription. It makes absolutely zero logical sense.

Serious question :what evidence do YOU have to believe he is the real deal?

Has anyone brought up Youtube other than you??
 
Reputedly, he traded live with his followers and fat fingered a trade and lost 1-2 mil without flinching..

I think he can trade ex meme,but obviously not as successfully..
Right guy,right place,right time...








Perhaps I am, I fully account for that possibility. But I know I am right about the majority of other individuals. Btw, I never zeroed in on that guy, I know next to nothing about him.
 
Did not know hes charging for shit now..Interesting timing.Zanger and Minervini do it as well..I think David Ryan is pure trader

They are all over youtube, even your apostle fully monetizes his claimed (unproven) success story through his website, merchandise,... Someone who "easily" made a hundred million in a few years does not bother selling merchandise or charges for an education subscription. It makes absolutely zero logical sense.

Serious question :what evidence do YOU have to believe he is the real deal?
 
I expressed several times clearly I don't educate nor charge for anything hence don't have any obligation to prove shit to you or others. Take it for whatever you want. And if you feel inclined, believe everything some guys state on Youtube. Your choice.
Look,I dont know why you dumb cocksuckers find it so hard to understand how he amassed 100mm. Kullamagi's strategy was as clear,simple,easy to understand as imaginable. He saw a stock he felt was breaking out and he shot his shot getting long. If it turned out to be a false breakout he quickly bailed on the trade,he didn't hang around long.He was one of the most risk averse traders I ever watched. He has said on numerous occasions he gets stopped out of 70 % of his trades. But the 30% of the times he "wins" the amounts blow away all the losses. Obviously that system doesn't work in a full-blown bear market.
 
Meaning, lucky. Yet he charges for all sorts of shit on his website, selling an intransferable asset, luck. Reputedly? In this age there is no video recordings or other footage of his every single action and decision online? Strange how those guys always fall short when it comes to proof.

Reputedly, he traded live with his followers and fat fingered a trade and lost 1-2 mil..

I think he can trade ex meme,but obviously not as successfully..
Right guy,right place,right time...
 
Yeah, it's very weird. I just don't get it. Probably takes an extra dose of greed to do that.

Did not know hes charging for shit now..Interesting timing.Zanger and Minervini do it as well..I think David Ryan is pure trader
 
Concerning the Turtles:
I do agree with what you said about them. But would like to add that when in the program they did extremely well on average. which tells us if the plan is good enough, and there is enough structure in place to tame your risk -> most can make money.

no big deal, the only missing element for most traders is having Richard Dennis and William Eckhardt as your boss and bankroll lol IVE FOUND THE HOLY FUCKING GRAIL RIGHT HERE!!!

I remember them saying that they selected the highly intelligent too just because they were available.
 
The only thing that is clear, simple, and easy to understand here is that you are an unapologetic follower of that guy. Go for it, nobody keeps you.

BTW, why would that not work in a full blown bear market?

Look,I dont know why you dumb cocksuckers find it so hard to understand how he amassed 100mm. Kullamagi's strategy was as clear,simple,easy to understand as imaginable. He saw a stock he felt was breaking out and he shot his shot getting long. If it turned out to be a false breakout he quickly bailed on the trade,he didn't hang around long.He was one of the most risk averse traders I ever watched. He has said on numerous occasions he gets stopped out of 70 % of his trades. But the 30% of the times he "wins" the amounts blow away all the losses. Obviously that system doesn't work in a full-blown bear market.
 
The only thing that is clear, simple, and easy to understand here is that you are an unapologetic follower of that guy. Go for it, nobody keeps you.
So then stop talking shit about something or someone you know nothing about.
 
I have tried to follow how all these (Kristian Kullamaggie is another) massive traders took sub $10k accounts to $1mm+ all while keeping good R:R? I hear the whole trading community arguing to keep your risk <1% of your total account. If thats say a $5000 account then thats $50 risk per trade. No matter how I try to extrapolate an insanely profitable trade (lets say buy stock at $20 and sell at $180 risk $50 and buy 25 shares for $2 stop=$3989 profit) its still hardly any money (in relation to time and traders like Zanger doing it in 23 months). Now the above outlined fringe case is exactly that. Super hard for most people to land a stock like that once let alone multiple times. My question is, is it more likely that guys like him are far exceeding 1% and going closer to a kelly,half kelly,optimal f etc. to attain these gains? Anything im missing?

Please refrain from commenting that the gains possibly weren't audited, that CANSLIM/momo swing trading doesnt work,that your trading system is far better blah blah blah. Above is just an example of these kind of traders saying they do it in this short amt of time and how they do it.

Thanks and godspeed for some tendies fellow netizens

The boys in the lab are calling it NZT.
 
Back
Top