Tariffs as a Punishment Measure and its Impact in Bilateral Trade
How China (or any other country) could punish a trade "partner" who violates the bilateral trade agreements between them.
The following is just an example with the given program parameters:
Interpretation:
In this example the punishment tariff is constant and kept 20 periods long. Period can be any interval, like quarter or year...
In that time span the bilateral trade shrinks by 33.24% (caused by the tariffs).
Without tariffs the result would be 178.53% better over tariffs.
And would grow 80.61% when there are no tariffs at all.
How China (or any other country) could punish a trade "partner" who violates the bilateral trade agreements between them.
The following is just an example with the given program parameters:
Code:
Tariffs as a Punishment Measure and its Impact in Bilateral Trade
NormalGrowth = +3.00% / period
PunishmentTariffs = -5.00% / period
NetGrowth = -2.00% / period
period start end dPeriod dPeriod% dAll dAll% endWOT dAll%WOT diff diff%
1 100.00 98.00 -2.00 -2.00% -2.00 -2.00% 103.00 3.00% 5.00 5.10%
2 98.00 96.04 -1.96 -2.00% -3.96 -3.96% 106.09 6.09% 10.05 10.46%
3 96.04 94.12 -1.92 -2.00% -5.88 -5.88% 109.27 9.27% 15.15 16.10%
4 94.12 92.24 -1.88 -2.00% -7.76 -7.76% 112.55 12.55% 20.31 22.02%
5 92.24 90.39 -1.84 -2.00% -9.61 -9.61% 115.93 15.93% 25.54 28.25%
6 90.39 88.58 -1.81 -2.00% -11.42 -11.42% 119.41 19.41% 30.82 34.79%
7 88.58 86.81 -1.77 -2.00% -13.19 -13.19% 122.99 22.99% 36.17 41.67%
8 86.81 85.08 -1.74 -2.00% -14.92 -14.92% 126.68 26.68% 41.60 48.90%
9 85.08 83.37 -1.70 -2.00% -16.63 -16.63% 130.48 30.48% 47.10 56.49%
10 83.37 81.71 -1.67 -2.00% -18.29 -18.29% 134.39 34.39% 52.68 64.48%
11 81.71 80.07 -1.63 -2.00% -19.93 -19.93% 138.42 38.42% 58.35 72.87%
12 80.07 78.47 -1.60 -2.00% -21.53 -21.53% 142.58 42.58% 64.10 81.69%
13 78.47 76.90 -1.57 -2.00% -23.10 -23.10% 146.85 46.85% 69.95 90.96%
14 76.90 75.36 -1.54 -2.00% -24.64 -24.64% 151.26 51.26% 75.89 100.70%
15 75.36 73.86 -1.51 -2.00% -26.14 -26.14% 155.80 55.80% 81.94 110.94%
16 73.86 72.38 -1.48 -2.00% -27.62 -27.62% 160.47 60.47% 88.09 121.71%
17 72.38 70.93 -1.45 -2.00% -29.07 -29.07% 165.28 65.28% 94.35 133.02%
18 70.93 69.51 -1.42 -2.00% -30.49 -30.49% 170.24 70.24% 100.73 144.91%
19 69.51 68.12 -1.39 -2.00% -31.88 -31.88% 175.35 75.35% 107.23 157.40%
20 68.12 66.76 -1.36 -2.00% -33.24 -33.24% 180.61 80.61% 113.85 170.53%
Legend: start=startcap end=endcap d=Delta WOT=normal_w/o_tariffs diff=btw_endWOT_and_end
In this example the punishment tariff is constant and kept 20 periods long. Period can be any interval, like quarter or year...

In that time span the bilateral trade shrinks by 33.24% (caused by the tariffs).
Without tariffs the result would be 178.53% better over tariffs.
And would grow 80.61% when there are no tariffs at all.
Last edited:
