Quote from krazykarl:
again, what structures in your country do you have that are similar to NPOs in the US? Do you know how their accounting is handled differently? Before you start calling people names you should read-up on what the differences are.
Read this very carefully. The very basic accounting standards like e.g. double-entry standards have remained the same for centuries. Every accountant whether in Vietnam, Pakistan, USA, UK or Uganda uses debits and credits.
Same semantically phreses only differ in their form form country to country and from continent to continent, e.g in one country one says ''amortisation of goodwill'' in the other one says ''depreciation of goodwill'', but still although it is named differently, no accountant and no financial analyst has ever had problems to recognize this item properly.
In US assets are presented from the top to bottom from the most liquid assets to the less liquid assets. And in Europe differently: from the less liquid assets to the most liquid assets. But the general rules of accounting are the same; irrespective of the country and irrespective of the type of business (in general). The specific rules have been subject to harmonisation over the last tens of years so that the differences between countries are not important.
The differences between countries are neglible, so that an accountant from the Netherlands can easily work in the USA and an American accountant can easily work in New Guinea. Period.
Even a menatlly disabled accountant will see that what the FED presents as ''capital'' is the same as ''equity capital'' or simply ''equity''.
And, contary to your claim, it is NOT the cash. Your idea of 102% capitalization is the most stupid one I ever heard of and will ever hear in my life. Period.
You are just an ignorant who quotes pseudo-financial gibberish with no real understanding of its meaning. Period.