OK Revised:
With a $10K account trading the system as the op described:
1 ES Contract Stop and take profits set at 3 Points: 5 trades per day $5 RT trading cost. Each win nets $145.00 each stop loses -$155.00
5 wins = Net $725.00
4 wins 1 stop = Net $425.00
3 wins 2 stops = Net $125.00
2 wins 3 stops = Net Loss -$175.00
1 Win 4 Stops = - $475.00
5 Stops = Net Loss -$775.00
Statistically you still will lose -$50 per day
If you use this exercise to trade random numbers you should realize you need to increase your winning odds and profit payouts.
One example would be to introduce a one step average down to shift the odds on the initial stop out and increase your profit taking x 2. ie. Start with 1 Contract average down at -2 points from entry and stop at -2.50 from entry. Take Profits at 6 points from entry with one contract or 2 points from entry with 2 contracts.
With these changes each win nets $290 but each stop only loses -$160.00.
5 wins = $1450
4 wins 1 stop = $1290
3 wins 2 stops = $550
2 wins 3 stops = $100
1 win 4 stops = -$350
5 stops = - $800
If you consistently win 2/5 you make a little dough.
The idea for certain styles of algorithmic trading is to keep increasing your odds at winning by systematically averaging down, pyramiding exits, reversing so there is a very limited and precise pattern the market must move for you to stop out. Outside of this one specific losing pattern every other iteration makes you money.
For the above instead of stopping at 2 1/2 points reverse and add 1 contract. Same base algo flipping sides until you catch a break out.
Adjust the profit taking portion of the algo to pyramid and ride out the trend.
When you do this as a sequence of trades 7 - 10 times inside a tight range you can increase your odds of winning to > 98% provided you can bank and stomach the trading size. Your losses from the 2% blows ups are fixed and substantially absorbed by your overall winnings.
Its all about ratios: keeping the odds of winning not only in your favor but the rewards substantial enough to absorb inevitable losses.
Quote from traderzhangSan:
what I meant is point in ES. not ticks(as one point has 4 ticks)