How can judges interpret law so differently??

[OPTIONAL777]

More broad brush responses. Too bad.

My position on abortion is clear, and very reasonable.

Quote from jem:

right, there is so much logic behind liberal positions.

Like killing babies as they are being born is humanitarian just because you call it late term.

 

[jem]

Quote from OPTIONAL777:

More broad brush responses. Too bad.

My position on abortion is clear, and very reasonable.

Your liberal values.... Kill, dismember torture, on demand. Let that little baby get ripped apart by a vacuum you or let it be "partially" born and then kill it.

Solid set of values there.

 

[OPTIONAL777]

Emotionally driven nonsense.

Quote from jem:

Your liberal values.... Kill, dismember torture, on demand. Let that little baby get ripped apart by a vacuum you or let it be "partially" born and then kill it.

Solid set of values there.

 

[jem]

I was just making your position clear. If that causes you to be emotional perhaps there is hope that you can become more logical and cease being a socialist commie liberal.

 

[OPTIONAL777]

My position did not need your help to be made clear.

Additionally, your comments below make it crystal clear that you are not able to understand my position due most likely to your reactionary broad brush thinking and subsequent fallacious comments.

Quote from jem:

I was just making your position clear. If that causes you to be emotional perhaps there is hope that you can become more logical and cease being a socialist commie liberal.

 

[jem]

so now you deny you support late term abortion?

 

[OPTIONAL777]

I've stated my position. If a fetus is scientifically viable, and the woman carrying the fetus does not want it, and if the government is willing to pay all costs for harvesting the fetus, raising it, and caring for it until the age of consent and responsibility...then the government can induce labor and harvest the fetus.

Quote from jem:

so now you deny you support late term abortion?

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from OPTIONAL777:

If a fetus is scientifically viable, and the woman carrying the fetus does not want it, and if the government is willing to pay all costs for harvesting the fetus, raising it, and caring for it until the age of consent and responsibility...then the government can induce labor and harvest the fetus.

Would that "age of consent" be in the context of what a pedophile would consider old enough, or what most of the rest of us would consider old enough?

 

[jem]

Quote from OPTIONAL777:

I've stated my position. If a fetus is scientifically viable, and the woman carrying the fetus does not want it, and if the government is willing to pay all costs for harvesting the fetus, raising it, and caring for it until the age of consent and responsibility...then the government can induce labor and harvest the fetus.

Therefore in all liberal compassion, you are "clearly" in favor of the late term abortion - which means.... as the human baby is coming out of the womens body, you support a women's right to snuff out the life of that human being. And you also support the women's right to hire an executioner.

I am just making your position clear.
Because the crap you wrote before is an abortion of a statement.