I have no contribution to make to your query.
Beating the house doesn't go unoticed in my experience. They do not like it and you have to move around as a consequence.
There is no cover when you are making money. People you work with talk and as they do they think up things to do. some of these things are unpleasant when they get out of hand.
Regulators notice too and they feel they have some sort of corner on what is what. When they are incorrect and they feel they are earning their keep, they are hard to give any input to.
As you get into the OPM thing it comes to you in several ways. the strings attachedare very funny in reflection but while they are in the space as a consequence of not covering the bases, you do have to spend energy to reach closure on the new found problem. After closure they sort of become unhappy with how closure was reached and the fact that there is no mor money flow. The absence of flow is very real to them. They do a lot of messy things in your environment.
As you see in the news, there are investors who are changing their plans. That can affect those with whom they are involved.
If you did have a way to make money, then you would have to consider the window of opportunity regarding OPM. It is not a wide thing. It ends when you do not want them. There is also the counterpart where those you wanted at first become not wanted at some point. This is academic in this thread since you are dealer dependent.
Going ahead is a requirement. It leads to discovery and sessation of the approach.
You will be bankrolled to the extent you stayed under the radar but, then, you can't play anymore.
If you ever get a way to make money, then ramping up is best done in a parallel capitalization period that has a predetermined end and big penalties for leaving early. Widening the conveyor belt is best done with internal funds that cannot be shadowed beneficially (traded in a trailing manner) by those downstream from your operations. Reverse engineering is not a possiblility these days for several reasons.
For several pages, until you let the cat out of the bag, your posts were remenicent of many past sucessful start ups. Too bad.
Beating the house doesn't go unoticed in my experience. They do not like it and you have to move around as a consequence.
There is no cover when you are making money. People you work with talk and as they do they think up things to do. some of these things are unpleasant when they get out of hand.
Regulators notice too and they feel they have some sort of corner on what is what. When they are incorrect and they feel they are earning their keep, they are hard to give any input to.
As you get into the OPM thing it comes to you in several ways. the strings attachedare very funny in reflection but while they are in the space as a consequence of not covering the bases, you do have to spend energy to reach closure on the new found problem. After closure they sort of become unhappy with how closure was reached and the fact that there is no mor money flow. The absence of flow is very real to them. They do a lot of messy things in your environment.
As you see in the news, there are investors who are changing their plans. That can affect those with whom they are involved.
If you did have a way to make money, then you would have to consider the window of opportunity regarding OPM. It is not a wide thing. It ends when you do not want them. There is also the counterpart where those you wanted at first become not wanted at some point. This is academic in this thread since you are dealer dependent.
Going ahead is a requirement. It leads to discovery and sessation of the approach.
You will be bankrolled to the extent you stayed under the radar but, then, you can't play anymore.
If you ever get a way to make money, then ramping up is best done in a parallel capitalization period that has a predetermined end and big penalties for leaving early. Widening the conveyor belt is best done with internal funds that cannot be shadowed beneficially (traded in a trailing manner) by those downstream from your operations. Reverse engineering is not a possiblility these days for several reasons.
For several pages, until you let the cat out of the bag, your posts were remenicent of many past sucessful start ups. Too bad.
