He's not natural, but much of what he says rings true.
And, no, there is no accounting for the glasses.
And, no, there is no accounting for the glasses.
Last edited:
So now that I'm going on 53, I've gotta ask you: At what age did you first notice your size diminishing past the point of realistically getting it back? I figure I might as well know what's coming down the pipeline than be surprised when it happens.I've given up trying to regain some of the size I had even as late as in my 50s.
So now that I'm going on 53, I've gotta ask you: At what age did you first notice your size diminishing past the point of realistically getting it back? I figure I might as well know what's coming down the pipeline than be surprised when it happens.


Safety first, of course. But I think most(?) people can still work up to going all out if they're doing the right exercises, the right way and on the right equipment, if any. I've read of people much older than us who are strength training to full intensity. With their doctor's okay, naturally. That's what slows down age-related sarcopenia, since the fast twitch fibers are the first to go.After working out for over 35 years, I got to the age where close members of my family started dying. It made me lose my desire to continue. Then my son bought me a total gym, because he didn't want me to lift heavy weights over my head anymore. A game changer at the age of 63 with the only desire is to maintain fitness and not build muscle, but maintain it.
Interesting. Did you change your routine in any way when you hit 60?I kept my size up to age 60 when I consciously decided to get (much) leaner. Figured it would benefit my joints and overall health going forward. Lost 35 # in 3 months and have kept it off +/- 5#.
The lost size was offset by significantly more definition which actually looks better at age 64