How are you traders competing with (and beating) the algos, HFTs, etc.?

Hey Scat ... disregard this disgruntled clown as he is a dually desperately seeking confrontation & attention. I know exactly who he is/was.

No Problemo! I don't seek anyone's agreement or approval... other than the one I see in the mirror....and Xela's, of course.... she's smart! (Hope I made her blush!) :)
 
Last edited:
Hope I made her blush!


That's harder than you think: aspiechicks are not famous for our "human emotions".
cheeky-smiley-010.gif
 
That's harder than you think: aspiechicks are not famous for our "human emotions".
cheeky-smiley-010.gif

Yeah, well... we'll work on yours. (And I do think we're making a bit of progress with you. After all you occasionally try to crack a joke, given a bit of time to think about it.) :)
 
Last edited:
There seem to be a lot of successful traders on here (and undoubtedly many unsuccessful ones). So, I'm just curious on how you guys think it is that you make money at it.

Take computer trading. Make a few assumptions:

1. Computers can execute trades much faster than humans; and

2. Programmers are just a smart as non-programming traders, and can program algorithms that catch and trade patters much faster than human traders.

3. There are plenty of these programmers (and programs) out there.

If all those assumptions are correct, how could human, non-automated trading really ever compete? Won't any recognizable pattern or statistic be picked up by the algorithms right away and they will get to the trade first, sucking any potential value away?

You might say, "yea, but we traders KNOW that their algorithms do this, and we react to this, and this is the pattern we trade on." But in short order it seems the algorithms would pick up on THAT as well, and get in first.

Just curious for yalls thoughts. Thanks!
Why do you want to compete with someone?
Trading is not trying to finish ahead of your opponents.
Your opponent is the market, not the other market participants.
It's not a matter of being the faster, or the smarter, or the best. The olympics are for that type of people.

The markets are like the oceans, you just need to pick your spoon and grab tiny bites, day after day. No need to try to grab everything all at once.
 
There seem to be a lot of successful traders on here (and undoubtedly many unsuccessful ones). So, I'm just curious on how you guys think it is that you make money at it.

Take computer trading. Make a few assumptions:

1. Computers can execute trades much faster than humans; and

2. Programmers are just a smart as non-programming traders, and can program algorithms that catch and trade patters much faster than human traders.

3. There are plenty of these programmers (and programs) out there.

If all those assumptions are correct, how could human, non-automated trading really ever compete? Won't any recognizable pattern or statistic be picked up by the algorithms right away and they will get to the trade first, sucking any potential value away?

You might say, "yea, but we traders KNOW that their algorithms do this, and we react to this, and this is the pattern we trade on." But in short order it seems the algorithms would pick up on THAT as well, and get in first.

Just curious for yalls thoughts. Thanks!

Saltynuts,

Good questions you have. I am programmer with a technical science back ground and have experience with programming automated trading strategies and back testing, and manual/discretionary trading. I do intraday trading on smaller timeframe chart.

From my limited experience, the art of trading is a day to day battle. I notice that it will require alot of adapting. Yes, I can have a strategy on what I look for each day, but once I enter the trade, it's like I have to carefully manage and control the risk.

I honestly, do not read or think about what the algo are doing. Why? Because I honestly can't control what they are doing. All I can control is what is infront of me. Recently, I stop the programming and got back to manually trading and starring at the charts. So i am in the trenching with the algos trying to make money.

I believe for us traders the market gives decent opportunities per day.
 
2. Programmers are just a smart as non-programming traders, and can program algorithms that catch and trade patters much faster than human traders.

Saltynuts,

I disagree with this. Programmers are not as smart as non-programming traders. Programmers are just code logical writing programmers. An experienced trader, still have to tell the programmer what the code up.

Even if a pattern occurs, we have to know how and when to enter the trade and manage it.
 
Now that’s getting a little too initimate.
Nobody wants competition where they eat, so I won’t tell you. But, on the other hand, I do accept investors *currently* and I do get audited by E&Y.

The best piece of advice I can give you is.....there is no edge in heavily traded instruments.

DeltaRisk,

Please give an example of a heavily traded instrument? Would this be the /ES for example?
 
Algos and HFT's are merely just scalping for literal crumbs. . , o_O

You won't and can't be affected by it if you're a macro trader realizing and timing and trading the major scoop move(s) of the day.
Leverage or options doing this, and you can be in a happy place if you have the necessary mindset and skill and wisdom to approach it.
2018 ET.

Saltynuts, you've been asking alot of questions for some time. -- Just trade and make a killing, or fail and leave/be quiet.

lawrence-lugar,

Good comment. I macro trader. I just trade daily.

From what I see on the chart, I believe the HFT algo folks are seeking small profits. It does not bother me cause I don't look for small profits.
 
YMQcLff.png

Don't compete against algos, go with them. You can clearly see that previous highs become support, then channel breaks prompting a short signal. Although I didn't short purely because of that; Nasdaq broke its long trend support and attempted to get back in, which was the precise high of today. Waited a bit for confirmation before shorting. Exited on second previous support due to higher volume area+breakout.
 
Don't concern yourself with anything you have no control over. There are however things you can control to become profitable. Also, I see no point in viewing what we do as "competition".
 
Back
Top