How American Oligarchs Are Pushing America to the Brink of Fascism

Capitalism has no morals and considers ethics a drain on profits.


A socialist uprising of the 99% must happen sooner than later.

Can you provide me a historical example in which any form of government with a sizable population did not end up as an oligarchy or dictatorship? The polar opposite of capitalism is communism. All communist countries have been oligarchies or dictatorships. For example, USSR, China, North Korea, Cuba, etc. Do you prefer a dictatorship to an oligarchy?

Do you know why democracies end up as oligarchies? It is because human beings are competitive. That is it. The only way a democracy doesn't end up as an oligarchy is if human cease to be competitive or humans cease to be part of the equation. A great case study is unions in the United States. Aren't they examples of smaller entities attempting their own form of socialism? Are they not essentially oligarchies? They have leaders that stay in power until they decide to retire normally and they get paid significantly more than the laborers in the union. Also, the unions demand that the laborers essentially pay taxes to the unions. Why is there such income equity within the unions within the US?

Do you know why communist countries end up being dictatorships? It is because humans are competitive. That is it.
 
Some labor union examples:


How much do the laborers in the Boilermakers' union get paid in total compensation on average? Is it anywhere close to $506,000.

How much do the laborers in the Laborers union get paid in total compensation on average? Is it anywhere close to $441,000.

How much do the laborers in the Transportation Communications union get paid in total compensation on average? Is it anywhere close to $750,000.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news...osses-salaries-put-big-in-big-labor/?page=all

There you go. There are examples of oligarchies within essentially socialist democracies.
 
Influence
February 4, 2015
Wall Street Pays Bankers to Work in Government and It Doesn't Want Anyone to Know
By David Dayen

Citigroup is one of three Wall Street banks attempting to keep hidden their practice of paying executives multimillion-dollar awards for entering government service. In letters delivered to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over the last month, Citi, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley seek exemption from a shareholder proposal, filed by the AFL-CIO labor coalition, which would force them to identify all executives eligible for these financial rewards, and the specific dollar amounts at stake. Critics argue these “golden parachutes” ensure more financial insiders in policy positions and favorable treatment toward Wall Street.

“As shareholders of these banks, we want to know how much money we have promised to give away to senior executives if they take government jobs,” said AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka in a statement. “It’s a simple question, but the banks don’t want to answer it. What are they trying to hide?”

The handouts recently received attention when Antonio Weiss, the former investment banker at Lazard now serving as counselor to Treasury Secretary Jack Lew, acknowledged in financial disclosures that he would be paid $21 million in unvested income and deferred compensation upon exiting the company for a job in government. Weiss withdrew from consideration to become the undersecretary for domestic finance under pressure from financial reformers, but the counselor position—which does not require congressional confirmation—probably still entitles him to the $21 million. The terms of the award are part of a Lazard employee agreement that nobody has seen.

These payments are routine at major banks, several of which have explicit policies, found in filings with the SEC, outlining automatic awards for executives who rotate into government. Goldman Sachs offers “a lump sum cash payment” for government service, for example.

More >>

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-9-billion-witness-20141106

The $9 Billion Witness: Meet JPMorgan Chase's Worst Nightmare
Meet the woman JPMorgan Chase paid one of the largest fines in American history to keep from talking

That's why the more important part of Fleischmann's story is in the pains Chase and the Justice Department took to silence her.

This past year she watched as Holder's Justice Department struck a series of historic settlement deals with Chase, Citigroup and Bank of America. The root bargain in these deals was cash for secrecy. [bold/underline mine]The banks paid big fines, without trials or even judges – only secret negotiations that typically ended with the public shown nothing but vague, quasi-official papers called "statements of facts," which were conveniently devoid of anything like actual facts.
 
http://www.theguardian.com/business...-swiss-bank-clients-dodge-taxes-hide-millions

HSBC files show how Swiss bank helped clients dodge taxes and hide millions
Data in massive cache of leaked secret bank account files lift lid on questionable practices at subsidiary of one of world’s biggest financial institutions


The origin of the leak
The HSBC files were obtained through an international collaboration of news outlets, including the Guardian, Le Monde, BBC Panorama and the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists
1
In late 2007, Hervé Falciani, an IT expert at HSBC's Swiss bank, hacked into its customer files. He fled to France with police on his trail for breaching Switzerland's rigid bank secrecy laws.
2
The French authorities detained him, but refused to extradite him when they realised the data could identify thousands of French tax evaders. Falciani now lives in France under protection.
3
In early 2010, under finance minister Christine Lagarde, France prepared confidential lists of the leaked names for other countries. The so-called "Lagarde list" led to scandal and arrests in Greece, Spain, the US, Belgium and Argentina.
4
Britain's tax authority, HMRC, received a list in 2010 from which it identified more than 1,000 tax evaders. More than £135m ($206m) was quietly recovered in repayments, but only one person was prosecuted. There has been no UK legal action against HSBC. Names were never revealed.
 
exactly what we should be concerned about whether...
ts united fruit as the crony owning the guatemala govt or Wall Street owning ours.
How much were all those cabinet advisors making as they constitute 50 to 70 percent of our Presidents cabinets.
Is it any wonder why no one go in trouble for taking down our economy after 2008 or that former wall street guys can Corzine other peoples money and not get prosecuted.



its particularly concerning if you realize the Federal Reserve gets to create US dollars at will via electronic notation.

How the heck would they not own the polticians over time.
Especially if there are no term limits and they can outspend non establishment politicians by giving the establishment campaign bribes.
The banks print way more money than does the fed. The banks also create US dollars via electronic notation.
 
That is a utopian libtard fantasy.

.......and they lived happily ever after.
The functional equivalent can be (indeed has been) achieved where the working class gets more of the fruit of its labor via successful wage demands, and progressive taxation.
 
I suspect you are correct... but we don't know because the Federal Reserve does not report how much money they create.

they don't even track M3 for us anymore.

The banks print way more money than does the fed. The banks also create US dollars via electronic notation.
 
exactly... the people owning the means of production is part of the unicorn and farilyland propaganda distributed by soros's network of salon.coms and lapped up by drones.
its the same place where you can keep increasing tax rates on the working class and small businesses without hurting the economy.



That is a utopian libtard fantasy.


.......and they lived happily ever after.
 
I suspect you are correct... but we don't know because the Federal Reserve does not report how much money they create.

they don't even track M3 for us anymore.
The .gov farmed out the vast majority of money creation to the banks. The current monetary system in the United States is designed for the banks to create the majority of the money.
 
Back
Top