House to vote on whether to consider articles of impeachment for Trump

It was my understanding that Grand Jury files are sealed by law.

It's complicated. It is sealed under law but the law provides for release if a court approves for various reasons set forth in the federal rules adopted persuant to the law. But that does not necessarily mean material is released to the public. It usually means that there can be a confidential sharing between other investigative bodies. Not to openly score political points.

Jerry is not willing to even state whether his kabuki dance constitutes an impeachment inquiry yet he wants to obtain the material to see if he can come up with a reason to start an impeachment. Not exactly a legally tidy process.

Anyway, unlike Sessions and Rosenstein and that crew, Barr is smart legally and not lazy or part of the swamp and will either knock it down or appeal it up to the supreme court so that Jerry will not get the info in the timeframe that his political agenda calls for. You know, you only need to add a month to this and the dems are going to be swimming in dirt from Horowitz's report. The republicans have plenty of investigation games they can play and further too if Jerry wants to. And, or especially if, he does not want to. Let the good times roll. Giddy-up. The more investigations the better.
 
It's amazing how little you know about how procedures work. The House must first authorize the House Judiciary Committee to open an investigation. This has not been done and so what Nonads is doing is simply for show as nothing legally can come of it. This is why Pelosi continues to get asked about impeachment and whether she thinks it should go forward. The House would need to authorize and then direct the committee and set standards for the committee and investigation. By the way, in The Constitution, there is no House Judiciary Committee, but there is a House which is responsible for bringing impeachment by majority vote .
---and still no majority vote by The House, so Nancy Pelosi is acting illegally by authorizing one herself.
 
So if a crazy Dem wants to put forth a complaint for impeachment to be referred to the Judiciary Committee they can. It is up to the leadership to decide if they want to take the impeachment complaint or bill and refer it to the committee. But an individual can start the process and if Nancy Pelosi wants to refer it to the Judiciary Committee she is free to do so or refuse.
No-----she is not free to do so. It must be authorized by a majority vote from the full House. --And it hasn't been so what she and Jerry Nonads are doing is illegal.
 
No-----she is not free to do so. It must be authorized by a majority vote from the full House. --And it hasn't been so what she and Jerry Nonads are doing is illegal.
It should backfire on her later today when the transcript of the call comes out. I hate to see transcripts of calls come out as it might set a precedent for their future release of sensitive info, but I think since Trump is anxious to get it out there, that the content is benign.
 
Last edited:
Realistically, the dems got themselves a first class shit show in progress right now.

The Democratic Committee for the Re-Election of Donald Trump is hard, hard at work. The RNC should re-imburse them for this one.
 
Realistically, the dems got themselves a first class shit show in progress right now.

The Democratic Committee for the Re-Election of Donald Trump is hard, hard at work. The RNC should re-imburse them for this one.
I've noticed that the harder the Idiot Dems push, the higher Trump's approval rating goes.
 
I had big doubts about whether the House could pass articles of impeachment, now I think it’s more likely than not.

The crowdstrike reference seals the deal.
 
I had big doubts about whether the House could pass articles of impeachment, now I think it’s more likely than not.

The crowdstrike reference seals the deal.

Because why? Because the clowdstrike discussion will take everyone back to Hillary and 2016 when you losers are already stuck in the mud from 2016?

Fine, as always, I say go for it, pussies. This little Ukraine fiasco has already blown one foot off this week. Go for the other and move on to impeachment.

It's beginning to look like the dems dont think they can beat Trump at the polls so want to go on the ill-fated impeachment voyage. Man, you losers are tanking fast. The general public has no interest in the arcane shit you are working. But lets get this thing going.

27302.jpg
 
Because why? Because the clowdstrike discussion will take everyone back to Hillary and 2016 when you losers are already stuck in the mud from 2016?

Fine, as always, I say go for it, pussies. This little Ukraine fiasco has already blown one foot off this week. Go for the other and move on to impeachment.

It's beginning to look like the dems dont think they can beat Trump at the polls so want to go on the ill-fated impeachment voyage. Man, you losers are tanking fast. The general public has no interest in the arcane shit you are working. But lets get this thing going.

27302.jpg

You’ll never understand that doing the right thing is more important than the politics.
 
Back
Top