If one stops casting every movement in terms of eager buyers and crafty sellers, he may find it easier to focus on price movement rather than the drama behind it. Granted I'm guilty of this myself. It makes the trading more fun. But it can't be allowed to interfere with trading decisions, not unlike pilots who kid around when there's nothing to do but watch the plane fly itself but who snap to when the need arises.
The business of traders is trading. Whether buyer or seller or short-seller, everybody's looking for a trade. Buyers don't try to "push" price higher, even though it seems that way; they are merely paying the ask, and if sellers quote the ask at ever-higher prices, buyers aren't "pushing" anything, they're just paying the ask. And if sellers can't find any buyers to take the ask, they have to lower their prices in order to get rid of whatever it is they're trying to get rid of. So price turns.
Unless buyers are stupid, and many of them are, they don't want to pay high prices for something unless they're convinced -- or have convinced themselves -- that they can sell it later at a higher price. On the other hand, sellers don't want to take any less than they're asking. So to say that sellers want price to fall and buyers want price to rise makes no sense, unless you're the sort who goes to the grocery store and wishes that bananas were more expensive (if you own shares in a banana plantation, sure; otherwise, no). Go check out some garage sales this weekend and see how many buyers push the sellers into taking more money than they've asked for.
Therefore, rather than look at this as buyers and sellers, look at it in terms of "traders" and focus primarily or even exclusively on price movement. The buyer/seller thing can be addressed later.
Me