House now investigating whether Trump lies to Mueller

TreeFrogTrader said:
Nope. I have consistently mentioned her as part of the cabal that includes brennan, rice, clapper, rosenstein, mccabe, Sally Yates, and Obama.

I see that that is too much detail for your binary mind though. So you just picked one.
More...

Excuse me. I didn’t have my deep state hierarchy correct. I’ll work on that.

Is there like an org chart or something I can reference?
 
Last edited:
Tony Stark said:
This seems to be a strong case

House lawyers disclosed the investigation into Trump’s written responses in September, saying in a court filing that materials from the Mueller report could show Trump was not honest about his knowledge of his campaign’s contacts with WikiLeaks, which published emails hacked from the Democratic Party.


The redacted Mueller report materials “have direct bearing on whether the president was untruthful, and further obstructed the special counsel’s investigation, when in providing written responses to the special counsel’s questions he denied being aware of any communications between his campaign and WikiLeaks,” the House lawyers said in the filing.


Last week, Trump’s former deputy campaign chairman, Rick Gates, suggested in testimony during a jury trial in a criminal case that Trump talked to longtime adviser Roger Stone about WikiLeaks during the 2016 campaign.


Gates testified that after finishing a July 2016 call from Stone, Trump indicated that “more information would be coming,” in an apparent reference to WikiLeaks.


Gates’ testimony appeared to conflict with sworn written statements that Trump gave Mueller.


In Trump’s written responses to Mueller, he said he could not recall discussing WikiLeaks with Stone.


“I do not recall discussing WikiLeaks with him,” Trump wrote. “Nor do I recall being aware of Mr. Stone having discussed WikiLeaks with individuals associated with my campaign.”
More...

Of course it’s a strong case. Trump is bad at everything he does, crime is no different.
 
RbDuTY.png
 
[
UsualName said:
Excuse me. I didn’t have my deep state hierarchy correct. I’ll work on that.

Is there like an org chart or something I can reference?
More...

I have my own org chart that outlines it so I am all set.

But clearly there has been lots of demand for an official org chart laying all of that out. Not to worry, Bill Barr has assigned John Durham to do just that.
 
UsualName said:
IRS Whistleblower complaint is moving forward now:

View attachment 213642

It never ends. There’s always a next crime with Trump.
More...

So let's see. Many, many dems - Pelosi included- eventually caved on the idea of proceeding with impeachment provided that it would be a quick hit and run and be over by the end of October. Howd that work out?

And by the end of last week it was clear that even the end of January would be optimistic. The house dems want to vote on Dec 20 or the week of, however they stated that. Then add a month for the Senate, oh and Christmas Break too, yaddy di, yaddy dah .

And now today we are packing in more need for investigation and more charges. There goes the much-coveted goal of having this over before the dem primaries beginning Feb 3.

Be careful Tards. You are not all that smart. Mitch can very easily run this out to April if you want. So far you are doing everything you can to help him with that.

Idiots.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top