Hottest First Lady ever ?

Why are you suddenly in all the threads I posted in? Coincidence or are you trolling me because you are developing gay feelings?


You happen to have an opinion on every thread on ET. I open the browser -> type elitetrader (autofills) -> hit "recent posts"





I dunno, tho. Maybe. You're growing on me. Like a starter-cock. Ya know... something small before I move on to the man-size.



.
 
well sorry, I am happily married and have never been into boys. You need to look for someone else.

You happen to have an opinion on every thread on ET. I open the browser -> type elitetrader (autofills) -> hit "recent posts"





I dunno, tho. Maybe. You're growing on me. Like a starter-cock. Ya know... something small before I move on to the man-size.



.
 
That is bollocks. There was no organization that used sound statistical techniques and got it right. None. And you wanted to disagree with the polls but surely did not know they were wrong, at least not to what degree. We all knew polls are missing something, but what and to what degree was everyone's guess.

That's bullshit. You didn't follow this election closely, evidently. Pollsters consistently over-sampled Democrats, minorities, women and consistently under-sampled Republicans, Independents, whites and men.

Each poll used different sample weightings. But the actual weightings of each demographic group are known and published. Comparing the poll sample weight against the actual proportional size of the demographic group showed how large the bias actually was.

In >90% of cases, it spelt a 5-10% margin for Trump. A difference of 10-20%, as the lying media (majority of pollsters) had nutbag Clinton ahead by 5-10%.

As far as your claim no legit pollster got it right. That's more bs.

The LA Times/USC poll consistently had Trump ahead by 5-10%. Same with Rasmuessen. Go check their methodology then report back here. Thanks.
 
Well, sounds like you are ready to start your own polling company, you should make a fortune with your so incredibly accurate metrics. Would be stupid of you to stay in Canada. Hush hush, back to where you come from and strike it rich.

Lol at your two polling companies that apparently got it right more than the other dozens. Of course you stuck with them and pointed that out early on in the election cycle. You did not actually. You ranted like Trump's 2 cent multi media army was instructed to.

That's bullshit. You didn't follow this election closely, evidently. Pollsters consistently over-sampled Democrats, minorities, women and consistently under-sampled Republicans, Independents, whites and men.

Each poll used different sample weightings. But the actual weightings of each demographic group are known and published. Comparing the poll sample weight against the actual proportional size of the demographic group showed how large the bias actually was.

In >90% of cases, it spelt a 5-10% margin for Trump. A difference of 10-20%, as the lying media (majority of pollsters) had nutbag Clinton ahead by 5-10%.

As far as your claim no legit pollster got it right. That's more bs.

The LA Times/USC poll consistently had Trump ahead by 5-10%. Same with Rasmuessen. Go check their methodology then report back here. Thanks.
 
You mean "buying a wife". And wait, I know many Americans define knowing a language when one can speak a few words. Do you find she can speak English when you listen to her freely speaking? Just want to get the definitions straight.

And this hot slut you're married to is with you because of your congenial personality.:rolleyes:
 
Well, sounds like you are ready to start your own polling company, you should make a fortune with your so incredibly accurate metrics. Would be stupid of you to stay in Canada. Hush hush, back to where you come from and strike it rich.

Lol at your two polling companies that apparently got it right more than the other dozens. Of course you stuck with them and pointed that out early on in the election cycle. You did not actually. You ranted like Trump's 2 cent multi media army was instructed to.

What the fuck are you talking about.

I just proved every point you made is complete horseshit, then you come back with some nonsense that doesn't even make sense.

Enjoy #TrumpNation sweetheart.
 
you mutt are picking 2 pollsters who turned out to be more accurate than others after the fact. You never stuck with them during the election circus. You are like a retard who at best did not trade, most likely lost money, but then tells everyone after a large market move that xyz indicator clearly predicted the move. You are a true comedian.

What the fuck are you talking about.

I just proved every point you made is complete horseshit, then you come back with some nonsense that doesn't even make sense.

Enjoy #TrumpNation sweetheart.
 
you mutt are picking 2 pollsters who turned out to be more accurate than others after the fact.

Another lie. Post the evidence, bitch.


You never stuck with them during the election circus.

I sure did. I posted those LA Times polls ad naseum. Again, another lie.

You seem to lie a lot, dont you? Were you even active here, during the election? I recall you popping up AFTER the election.


You are like a retard who at best did not trade, most likely lost money, but then tells everyone after a large market move that xyz indicator clearly predicted the move. You are a true comedian.

Another complete lie. Anyone can search for themselves my post history, my support of Trump, my continual argument the polls were rigged, that Trump was well ahead, that the Globalists would likely steal the election, and Trump would be denied.

That's been my stance for the past 12 months, ad nasuem. Any regular poster to the Basement could confirm the same, as I've been prolific well past the point of annoyance.

If you had been active here over the past year, you would have known that.

Which proves you're talking shit.

Keep it moving, sweetheart.
 
Back
Top