Hopes of mild climate change dashed by new research

exGOPer said:
The dishonesty is in the scaling and averaging out the data - it's pretty self evident in the graph I posted
More...


And the use of balloon data which is not surface air temps.

See, most people do not know about this stuff. We can call them ignorant about it. Not so bad. But jerm and piehole DO know. We call people like him and piehole liars. Pieces of shit liars. Quite possibly being paid to lie for the industry. Just like the T Rump admin.

There is a large disinformation, social lobbying campaign being waged by the fossil fuel and related conservative/corporate interests. The doubt merchants. The only ones countering them are people like us.
 
futurecurrents said:
And the use of balloon data which is not surface air temps.

See, most people do not know about this stuff. We can call them ignorant about it. Not so bad. But jerm and piehole DO know. We call people like him and piehole liars. Pieces of shit liars. Quite possibly being paid to lie for the industry. Just like the T Rump admin.
More...

Now you can crawl back to your Skeptical Science "crushers" forum and brag once again how you put down those terrible deniers with your on-line eloquence.
 
gwb-trading said:
Better than being a fervent religious follower of a cult site led by a cartoonist passing off fabrications as science.
More...

I don't care about the effects of climate change at all or even for most other matters of public policy - people should reap their karma for what they have done (like all those Trump voters losing their health coverage). The thing is that when it comes to scientific evidence, there is no denying climate is changing because of human actions, 'believing' in that fact doesn't make me a cultist because I could care less if anything is done about it or anyone believes it.
 
exGOPer said:
I don't care about the effects of climate change at all or even for most other matters of public policy - people should reap their karma for what they have done (like all those Trump voters losing their health coverage). The thing is that when it comes to scientific evidence, there is no denying climate is changing because of human actions, 'believing' in that fact doesn't make me a cultist because I could care less if anything is done about it or anyone believes it.
More...

Actually there is very little scientific evidence that climate is changing due to human emitted CO2. In time this will be proven to be a complete fraud.
 
exGOPer said:
I would take NASA's word over yours anyday.
More...

That's fine -- take the papers from NASA as provided by jem, but ignore the nonsense posted at the climate.nasa.gov site which is simply a university website maintained by graduate students with no full-time NASA employee involvement.
 
gwb-trading said:
That's fine -- take the papers from NASA as provided by jem, but ignore the nonsense posted at the climate.nasa.gov site which is simply a university website maintained by graduate students with no full-time NASA employee involvement.
More...

“In the last 30 years we’ve really moved into exceptional territory,” Gavin Schmidt, director of Nasa’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, said. “It’s unprecedented in 1,000 years. There’s no period that has the trend seen in the 20th century in terms of the inclination (of temperatures).”

So Director of their Space Studies is a student? Citation?
 
exGOPer said:
“In the last 30 years we’ve really moved into exceptional territory,” Gavin Schmidt, director of Nasa’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, said. “It’s unprecedented in 1,000 years. There’s no period that has the trend seen in the 20th century in terms of the inclination (of temperatures).”

So Director of their Space Studies is a student? Citation?
More...

Goddard is climate.nasa.gov

I will let jem set you straight. Or you can simply use Search to review all the NASA information he posted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top