Quote from Yannis:
Actually, they were, but you refuse to see it.
Actually it was Clinton who didn't react properly during his 8 years... what was occupying that paragon of Dem honesty and virtue?Quote from bigarrow:
Lets see 9-11 the worst terrorist attack in history, Bush refused to see the warning signs. Iraq, weapons of mass destruction, wrong...
Bush reacted to the crisis perfectly and got us out of it, moved the trouble overseas, etc. Wrt WMD, the UN reported they had them (several times in the 90s), Saddam claimed they had them, the Iraqi regime was behaving very suspiciously hiding stuff and kicking the UN inspectors out, Bush felt that he had to act, I understand. We didn't find any, and that was the good news, think of the alternative. But, many in the Intelligence community believe that Saddam sent them to Syria, the same way he had sent his fighter jets to Iran a few years before. The net result is that this country remained safe and Iraq/Afghanistan got rid of their bloody dictators - excellent! But, as I said before, you seem to be too stupid to see it, sorry.Quote from bigarrow:
Lets see 9-11 the worst terrorist attack in history, Bush refused to see the warning signs. Iraq, weapons of mass destruction, wrong. The Iraq war will pay for itself, wrong. And on and on. You my blind christian man are the one who refuses to see the truth. Remember Yannis lock step, lock step, onward christian soldier, no thinking required or recommended.
I'll give this to you this though I'd rather go party with Bush, I bet he was a blast in his day.
You didn't mention 9/11 in your first post.Quote from bigarrow:
Lets see 9-11 the worst terrorist attack in history,
I'll give this to you this though I'd rather go party with Bush, I bet he was a blast in his day.
Quote from Yannis:
Actually it was Clinton who didn't react properly during his 8 years... what was occupying that paragon of Dem honesty and virtue?Bush reacted to the crisis perfectly and got us out of it, moved the trouble overseas, etc. Wrt WMD, the UN reported they had them (several times in the 90s), Saddam claimed they had them, the Iraqi regime was behaving very suspiciously hiding stuff and kicking the UN inspectors out, Bush felt that he had to act, I understand. We didn't find any, and that was the good news, think of the alternative. But, many in the Intelligence community believe that Saddam sent them to Syria, the same way he had sent his fighter jets to Iran a few years before. The net result is that this country remained safe and Iraq/Afghanistan got rid of their bloody dictators - excellent! But, as I said before, you seem to be too stupid to see it, sorry.
Quote from Mercor:
You didn't mention 9/11 in your first post.
Would you like to party with this guy?
Long before the national media spotlight began to shine on every twist and turn of his life's journey, Barack Obama had this to say about himself: "Junkie. Pothead. That's where I'd been headed: the final, fatal role of the young would-be black man. . . . I got high [to] push questions of who I was out of my mind."
In the book, Obama acknowledges that he used cocaine but rejected heroin. "Pot had helped, and booze; maybe a little blow when you could afford it. Not smack, though," he says.
Words of a President.....
Quote from bigarrow:
Hey buttscoe, I told you before fuck off dude you are an idiot. Your put downs are sophomoric at the very best and would embarrass most sophomores. But you buttscoe are just stupid.
Quote from bigarrow:
If Bush was honest his comments would be similiar to Obama's. Like many people in that age group people partied and used drugs and had pre-martial sex ( don't tell Yannis) and like many went on to become successful people.
I can see both sides to the argument, my beef is with the brain dead support of Bush by the idiot right, those guys are fools.
I do know that 9-11 could of happened no matter who was president, but it would not change the fact that it was a failure to protect America by who ever was president. Iraq was a mistake no matter who would of made the decision, but I don't think a democrat president would of attacked Iraq. Unlike the the brain dead right wing followers I do try to look at both sides of the issue and make an informed decision and also that there isn't a 100% right or wrong in most political and social issues. I also realize that I could be and have been wrong and time is a good test of that and I change my positions and opinions accordingly, something the right should consider doing.