Homophobes. what religion does to your mind.

[peilthetraveler]

Quote from rew:

Free Thinker assumes that the people talking about murdering their unborn children if they're gay are religious. Well, let's suppose he's right. Then we have two groups of people:

1) Religious believers, a tiny minority of whom say they'd murder their unborn child if it was homosexual.

2) Atheists, a great many of whom will happily murder an unborn child for any reason at all, and consider it to be a right, sanctioned by the Warren Court.

+1

Lets see if Free Thinker responds to this comment.

 

[Free Thinker]

Quote from rew:

Free Thinker assumes that the people talking about murdering their unborn children if they're gay are religious. Well, let's suppose he's right. Then we have two groups of people:

1) Religious believers, a tiny minority of whom say they'd murder their unborn child if it was homosexual.

2) Atheists, a great many of whom will happily murder an unborn child for any reason at all, and consider it to be a right, sanctioned by the Warren Court.

if you cant see a difference between murdering you living child just because you found out it was gay and a womans choice to have a child you are depraved.
in any case i dont support murdering a child. not many people do.

 

[peilthetraveler]

Quote from Free Thinker:

if you cant see a difference between murdering you living child just because you found out it was gay and a womans choice to have a child you are depraved.
in any case i dont support murdering a child. not many people do.

Nice footwork there Freethinker. A liberal would not see it, but we conservatives see right through your answer. Your original post used people talking to their UNBORN Children. Now you are backtracking and saying they are saying it about their live children.

Typical liberal bullshit. You get backed into a corner and you have to pretend like you originally said something else to try to make yourself right.

 

[Free Thinker]

Quote from peilthetraveler:

Nice footwork there Freethinker. A liberal would not see it, but we conservatives see right through your answer. Your original post used people talking to their UNBORN Children. Now you are backtracking and saying they are saying it about their live children.

Typical liberal bullshit. You get backed into a corner and you have to pretend like you originally said something else to try to make yourself right.

the children would have to be born before the parents figured out they were gay. geeze does logic escape you?

 

[rew]

Quote from Free Thinker:

the children would have to be born before the parents figured out they were gay. geeze does logic escape you?

It is very likely that homosexuality is due to a combination of genes and hormonal influences during fetal development. So yes, just as you liberals say, homosexuals are born that way. So it isn't much of a stretch to imagine the development of prenatal testing for homosexuality, although such tests don't exist now.

In any case, I don't see a heck of a lot of difference between killing an 8 month old fetus (abortion) or a 10 month old fetus (infanticide).

Now, suppose prenatal tests for homosexuality were developed. Is it okay for women to abort fetuses tested to be gay? If not, you are saying that a woman can abort a fetus for any reason <i>except</i> it being homosexual.

 

[Free Thinker]

Quote from rew:

It is very likely that homosexuality is due to a combination of genes and hormonal influences during fetal development. So yes, just as you liberals say, homosexuals are born that way. So it isn't much of a stretch to imagine the development of prenatal testing for homosexuality, although such tests don't exist now.

In any case, I don't see a heck of a lot of difference between killing an 8 month old fetus (abortion) or a 10 month old fetus (infanticide).

there is a big difference for thinking people and the law.
question for you and pielthebiblethumper. lets say thet there was a test for homosexuality in the womb. would you abort that fetus?

 

[rew]

Quote from Free Thinker:

there is a big difference for thinking people and the law.
question for you and pielthebiblethumper. lets say thet there was a test for homosexuality in the womb. would you abort that fetus?

Here is a question for you. Why do you support the right of a woman to abort a fetus for any reason <i>except</i> for the fetus being homosexual?

 

[Free Thinker]

Quote from rew:

Here is a question for you. Why do you support the right of a woman to abort a fetus for any reason <i>except</i> for the fetus being homosexual?

you forgot to answer my question.you answer my line of questions and i will answer this one.

 

[rew]

Quote from Free Thinker:

you forgot to answer my question.you answer my line of questions and i will answer this one.

Being a man, I'm not going to ever get an abortion. If there was a prenatal test for homosexuality, I wouldn't even recommend that my wife use it. Now answer the damn question.

 

[Free Thinker]

Quote from rew:

Being a man, I'm not going to ever get an abortion. If there was a prenatal test for homosexuality, I wouldn't even recommend that my wife use it. Now answer the damn question.

many christians believe that if a child dies at birth it gets a free pass to heaven.
knowing that your unborn child would go to heaven if aborted but would go to hell if born a homosexual would you abort that child?