Quote from onlytronalso:
Good points Grob!
Of course for day traders everything is in the now.
But for position traders, now is just for evaluating the progress of the position verses what was anticipated.
Position traders do make targets. How else could they apply the risks vs. rewards.
Position traders can, likewise, get past where you are.
The alternative to targeting comes on two different levels.
Repeatability and reliability characterisitcs of stosks for position trading allow a person to determine how much money he is making per day. Ranking (%/day) affords a person to put the universe in a sorted order. When a stock's percentage for a day begins to wane, then a rising precentage stock replaces it.
Having a universe of high money velocity stocks (3 beta and better) and cross over trading them is quite different then what you speak of. Such universes range in rank from 4 to 7 percent daily, normally.
About 5 pairs of variables are used to determine the crossover dynamically use data sets taken NOW.
You will notice there is no trageting nor is there and risk consideration. compounding occurs daily with values of 4 to 7 percent put in the formula and the annual compounding uses about 240 days in the year as the exponent.
You are suggesting a betting and targeting approach is your orientation; I would imagine that you use stops as well as a protection.
I feel it is much better to be very risk adverse and only have extremelt reliable and repeatable stocks is a very small universe of the most excellent stocks for making money.
Today the monitoring tools automatically bring the available stocks to the top of your lists right from the daily open. The same is true for stocks you own. On a daily basis in real time they arrangethemselves by their current money making performance. Volume is used to determine the real time ranking; their % gain during the day is right there to see as well.
4 to 7 percent per day compounded daily is a very different type of money making than you are speaking of by doing the predicting, bettin, protecting and hoping. there is a great value in continuous monitoing using a NOW based strategy for performance under conditions that are very risk adverse.
some people find this approach to be "unbelievable" It is just there for he taking, however and onlt depends on knowledge, skills and experience. Coomonly things get to be unbelievable if a person has no standard of knowledge, skills or experience. It is conventional in most businesses to use people who have knowledge, skills and experience to support the work a business is doing. these kind off people as actually in great demand, I am told.