Holocaust Remembrance Day
- Thread starter BernardRichards
- Start date
- Status
Wow!!! I thought you're just a typical brainwashed ultra-liberal Euro-idiot. You're actually a neo-nazi.
Oh and btw:
Germany's first institute of race biology, the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics, opens in 1927, in Berlin. The Institute's chairman, Eugen Fischer, says its task is to 'investigate the connection between heredity, environment and crossbreeding, and to promote social measures which benefit racially sound individuals'.
A neo-Nazi or PAL in disguise that has mastered Goebbels fabrication technique. "Tell a lie enough times and it becomes the truth."
Ach wie gut ist dass niemand weiss dass ich Rumpelstinskin heiss.
THE T-4 ('EUTHANASIA') PROGRAMME (by Andria Ioannou)
In a speech in August 1929 in the Nuremberg Party Rally, Hitler said âIf Germany was to get a million children a year and was to remove 700,000-800,000 of the weakest people, then the final result might even be an increase in strengthâ (Bock, 1986, p.24). The radical intentions of Hitler and his party were therefore clear even before their coming to power. The first step towards this, which was the sterilization of the âhereditarily illâ, had been taking place since the early 1930s in Germany (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.136-7). Despite the fact that these measures were drastic, Hitler did not think they were enough. In 1935, he told the Reich Physiciansâ Leader that in the case of war, he would implement âeuthanasiaâ, as it would be easier to solve such a problem in war-time (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.142). Hence, the term âeuthanasiaâ as we know it had nothing to do with this programme. It was clearly a case of continual mass murders.
The key figures in the âeuthanasiaâ programme were Karl Brandt and Philipp Bouhler. The initial stage of the programme was a âchildrenâs euthanasiaâ programme in which some cases were assessed by doctors and decided whether the child would live or die. The killings were carried out by starvation or lethal injection and cost the lives of approximately 5,200 children including infants and adolescents (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.143-4).
In a speech in August 1929 in the Nuremberg Party Rally, Hitler said âIf Germany was to get a million children a year and was to remove 700,000-800,000 of the weakest people, then the final result might even be an increase in strengthâ (Bock, 1986, p.24). The radical intentions of Hitler and his party were therefore clear even before their coming to power. The first step towards this, which was the sterilization of the âhereditarily illâ, had been taking place since the early 1930s in Germany (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.136-7). Despite the fact that these measures were drastic, Hitler did not think they were enough. In 1935, he told the Reich Physiciansâ Leader that in the case of war, he would implement âeuthanasiaâ, as it would be easier to solve such a problem in war-time (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.142). Hence, the term âeuthanasiaâ as we know it had nothing to do with this programme. It was clearly a case of continual mass murders.
The key figures in the âeuthanasiaâ programme were Karl Brandt and Philipp Bouhler. The initial stage of the programme was a âchildrenâs euthanasiaâ programme in which some cases were assessed by doctors and decided whether the child would live or die. The killings were carried out by starvation or lethal injection and cost the lives of approximately 5,200 children including infants and adolescents (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.143-4).
Exhibit 5: Excerpt from the official letter sent to a victim's family
The programme became an open secret even though the personnel tried to conceal these actions such as by falsifying death certificates and sending the ânotificationâ letters (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.150). The local communities near the killing centers soon became aware of what was happening (Burleigh, 2000, p.394). Also, some of the personnelâs macabre mistakes such as sending two urns instead of one, some relatives being notified of the death of their relative whom they had removed from asylums, hairpins found in the ashes of males and so on increased awareness amongst relatives, and society in general about the programmeâs existence (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.150). In addition, a sermon by the Bishop of Münster on 3 August 1941 was condemning these actions and had serious political and social aftermath (Burleigh, 2000, p.402).
It is not certain what brought about the cancellation of the programme on 24 August 1941 but it was probably due to a combination of factors. More importantly, the target number of victims had been reached (Klee, 1987, pp. 33ff). By 1 September 1941, 93,251 patients had been killed, out of which 70,273 had been gassed (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.153).
As in the case of Jews, propaganda was a priority for the regime. The regime used propaganda to try to influence peopleâs opinions about âeuthanasiaâ in many ways. Children were not an exception to this, and Exhibit 6 shows the extent of propaganda, even at schools. It was important that it reached everyone and made them (or at least tried) feel burdened and harmed by asylum patients. Other methods intended to influence public opinion were documentaries and films that stigmatized asylum patients and acted in favour of euthanasia (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.154). These films were seen by millions of people.
Below is an excerpt from a letter sent to the family of a victim, where the attempt to deceive them becomes clear.
âToday the asylum accounting office received your credit transfer of RM20 intended for flowers for the grave of your little daughter Irmgardâ¦Concerning your little daughter, we can report that Irmgard was still overjoyed with the little coat, and above all with the lovely little dolly, which she had in her arms to the very endâ.
The programme became an open secret even though the personnel tried to conceal these actions such as by falsifying death certificates and sending the ânotificationâ letters (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.150). The local communities near the killing centers soon became aware of what was happening (Burleigh, 2000, p.394). Also, some of the personnelâs macabre mistakes such as sending two urns instead of one, some relatives being notified of the death of their relative whom they had removed from asylums, hairpins found in the ashes of males and so on increased awareness amongst relatives, and society in general about the programmeâs existence (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.150). In addition, a sermon by the Bishop of Münster on 3 August 1941 was condemning these actions and had serious political and social aftermath (Burleigh, 2000, p.402).
It is not certain what brought about the cancellation of the programme on 24 August 1941 but it was probably due to a combination of factors. More importantly, the target number of victims had been reached (Klee, 1987, pp. 33ff). By 1 September 1941, 93,251 patients had been killed, out of which 70,273 had been gassed (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.153).
As in the case of Jews, propaganda was a priority for the regime. The regime used propaganda to try to influence peopleâs opinions about âeuthanasiaâ in many ways. Children were not an exception to this, and Exhibit 6 shows the extent of propaganda, even at schools. It was important that it reached everyone and made them (or at least tried) feel burdened and harmed by asylum patients. Other methods intended to influence public opinion were documentaries and films that stigmatized asylum patients and acted in favour of euthanasia (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.154). These films were seen by millions of people.
Below is an excerpt from a letter sent to the family of a victim, where the attempt to deceive them becomes clear.
âToday the asylum accounting office received your credit transfer of RM20 intended for flowers for the grave of your little daughter Irmgardâ¦Concerning your little daughter, we can report that Irmgard was still overjoyed with the little coat, and above all with the lovely little dolly, which she had in her arms to the very endâ.
Exhibit 5: Excerpt from the official letter sent to a victim's family
The programme became an open secret even though the personnel tried to conceal these actions such as by falsifying death certificates and sending the ânotificationâ letters (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.150). The local communities near the killing centers soon became aware of what was happening (Burleigh, 2000, p.394). Also, some of the personnelâs macabre mistakes such as sending two urns instead of one, some relatives being notified of the death of their relative whom they had removed from asylums, hairpins found in the ashes of males and so on increased awareness amongst relatives, and society in general about the programmeâs existence (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.150). In addition, a sermon by the Bishop of Münster on 3 August 1941 was condemning these actions and had serious political and social aftermath (Burleigh, 2000, p.402).
It is not certain what brought about the cancellation of the programme on 24 August 1941 but it was probably due to a combination of factors. More importantly, the target number of victims had been reached (Klee, 1987, pp. 33ff). By 1 September 1941, 93,251 patients had been killed, out of which 70,273 had been gassed (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.153).
As in the case of Jews, propaganda was a priority for the regime. The regime used propaganda to try to influence peopleâs opinions about âeuthanasiaâ in many ways. Children were not an exception to this, and Exhibit 6 shows the extent of propaganda, even at schools. It was important that it reached everyone and made them (or at least tried) feel burdened and harmed by asylum patients. Other methods intended to influence public opinion were documentaries and films that stigmatized asylum patients and acted in favour of euthanasia (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.154). These films were seen by millions of people.
Below is an excerpt from a letter sent to the family of a victim, where the attempt to deceive them becomes clear.
âToday the asylum accounting office received your credit transfer of RM20 intended for flowers for the grave of your little daughter Irmgardâ¦Concerning your little daughter, we can report that Irmgard was still overjoyed with the little coat, and above all with the lovely little dolly, which she had in her arms to the very endâ.
The programme became an open secret even though the personnel tried to conceal these actions such as by falsifying death certificates and sending the ânotificationâ letters (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.150). The local communities near the killing centers soon became aware of what was happening (Burleigh, 2000, p.394). Also, some of the personnelâs macabre mistakes such as sending two urns instead of one, some relatives being notified of the death of their relative whom they had removed from asylums, hairpins found in the ashes of males and so on increased awareness amongst relatives, and society in general about the programmeâs existence (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.150). In addition, a sermon by the Bishop of Münster on 3 August 1941 was condemning these actions and had serious political and social aftermath (Burleigh, 2000, p.402).
It is not certain what brought about the cancellation of the programme on 24 August 1941 but it was probably due to a combination of factors. More importantly, the target number of victims had been reached (Klee, 1987, pp. 33ff). By 1 September 1941, 93,251 patients had been killed, out of which 70,273 had been gassed (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.153).
As in the case of Jews, propaganda was a priority for the regime. The regime used propaganda to try to influence peopleâs opinions about âeuthanasiaâ in many ways. Children were not an exception to this, and Exhibit 6 shows the extent of propaganda, even at schools. It was important that it reached everyone and made them (or at least tried) feel burdened and harmed by asylum patients. Other methods intended to influence public opinion were documentaries and films that stigmatized asylum patients and acted in favour of euthanasia (Burleigh & Wippermann, 1991, p.154). These films were seen by millions of people.
Below is an excerpt from a letter sent to the family of a victim, where the attempt to deceive them becomes clear.
âToday the asylum accounting office received your credit transfer of RM20 intended for flowers for the grave of your little daughter Irmgardâ¦Concerning your little daughter, we can report that Irmgard was still overjoyed with the little coat, and above all with the lovely little dolly, which she had in her arms to the very endâ.
Young Jewish girl in shock after gang rape by Germans.
Four naked women walking to the edge of the pit to be shot.
Jews lined up against the wall and shot.
Large number of Jews lined up at wall and shot.
Nazi firing squad killing Jews.
Jew prepares to fall into a pit full of dead Jews as Nazi sonderkommando (special SS killing squads) holds pistol to the base of his head.
Recently freed convicts slaughter Jews with crowbars.
I think that the "Palestinians" and the rest of the Islamists and their supporters deserve this type of holocaust so they can differentiate between their fake victimhood in order to terrorize the rest of us, and the real thing!
a_person,
Again you screwed up.
Here is why:
''In May 1926, Rockefeller awarded $250,000 toward creation of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry. Among the leading psychiatrists at the German Psychiatric Institute was Ernst Rüdin, who became director and eventually an architect of Hitler's systematic medical repression.''
''Another in the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute's complex of eugenics institutions was the Institute for Brain Research. Since 1915, it had operated out of a single room. Everything changed when Rockefeller money arrived in 1929. A grant of $317,000 allowed the institute to construct a major building and take center stage in German race biology. The institute received additional grants from the Rockefeller Foundation during the next several years. Leading the institute, once again, was Hitler's medical henchman Ernst Rüdin. Rüdin's organization became a prime director and recipient of the murderous experimentation and research conducted on Jews, Gypsies and others. ''
Below you will find a picture of Josef Mengele. A mastermind of experiments on humans (including Jews). I can post pictures of notable Jews smiling while writing cheques for dr Mengele's ''research'' program.
Instead of offending me, please let me know if you need other evidence than plain text. And do your homework: read some history books (not the ones published in USA, Germany or Russia, because these are biased).
Regards
This is who Mengele was: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mengele
bastard germans. like japanese, they should be exterminated as a nation and their women sold as sex slaves, their language forever eradicated
- Status