Holder bars civil asset forfeiture

Holder limits seized-asset sharing process that split billions with local, state police
http://www.washingtonpost.com/inves...7ca058-99d4-11e4-bcfb-059ec7a93ddc_story.html

Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. on Friday barred local and state police from using federal law to seize cash, cars and other property without proving that a crime occurred.

Holder’s action represents the most sweeping check on police power to confiscate personal property since the seizures began three decades ago as part of the war on drugs.

Since 2008, thousands of local and state police agencies have made more than 55,000 seizures of cash and property worth $3 billion under a civil asset forfeiture program at the Justice Department called Equitable Sharing.

The program has enabled local and state police to make seizures and then have them “adopted” by federal agencies, which share in the proceeds. The program allowed police departments and drug task forces to keep up to 80 percent of the proceeds of the adopted seizures, with the rest going to federal agencies.

“With this new policy, effective immediately, the Justice Department is taking an important step to prohibit federal agency adoptions of state and local seizures, except for public safety reasons,” Holder said in a statement.

Holder’s decision allows some limited exceptions, including illegal firearms, ammunition, explosives and property associated with child pornography, a small fraction of the total. This would eliminate virtually all cash and vehicle seizures made by local and state police from the program.


(More at above url)
 
:blink: :blink:

Well I'll be damned. Haven't read it yet, but I have heard some horror stories about people having stuff seized w/o any real evidence or court action. Sounds like a good idea.
 
So Holder has at least two accomplishments on his resume now. His other was to stop the prosecution of Sen. Ted Stevens because of unethical conduct by DOJ attorneys.
 
Republicans could do something useful for once, instead of just getting us into pointless wars and pimping for big companies.

They could stop the idiotic War on Drugs, cut the DEA back to nothing and in the process enhance their terrible image with younger voters.

Obama would probably go along with it, and we could all feel good about finally getting something done in a bipartisan manner.
 
Republicans could do something useful for once, instead of just getting us into pointless wars and pimping for big companies.

They could stop the idiotic War on Drugs, cut the DEA back to nothing and in the process enhance their terrible image with younger voters.

Obama would probably go along with it, and we could all feel good about finally getting something done in a bipartisan manner.
amen my brother

the funny thing is, nobody can come up with an intellectual answer to why we have a war on drugs

there are some old quotes from "Reefer Madness" but that is about it

it really is, "The Emperor Has No Clothes"

Everyone my age and younger knows it is stupid, but that old white dying republican party is afraid of it like they are afraid of their own shadow.
 
No halo for Holder on forfeiture fix
The top lawman who condemns seizures previously championed them

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/19/james-bovard-eric-holder-championed-seizures-befor/

That article is pretty damning for Holder, and none of it is surprising. At least the position is reversed now, though I agree with the last paragraph stating that there is no substitute for congressional action that would prohibit this in the future, as the Justice Department is notorious for caving to pressure and then reversing action when the public eye is elsewhere.
 
Back
Top