hmm.no edges in the markets

Still can't give up talking about TA....man you are obsessed! :D

Quote from galvinlee888:

I can feel someone (or even a whole TA group) are trying to avoid the live call or even a posted a link that proof TA is working.

The answer is obvious now.

:D
 
Quote from galvinlee888:

I can feel someone (or even a whole TA group) are trying to avoid the live call or even a posted a link that proof TA is working.

:D

And the anti ta group? One wont talk about his method other than tell you it takes hundreds of PhDs to generate, the other describes his trades in..TA...and another quotes TA indicators :lol:
 
Quote from sheda:

You wont impart the knowledge to me over IM that would allow me to save hundreds of millions hiring PhDs grads and building systems just because I posted a moving average? :D

May be you should use your hundred of million to hire PhD grads to look at TA, so that you can generate hundred of billions ? :D
 
What, spend that much money so educated people like you can look at a chart and say All I see here is the past! And then propose I invest my money into the creation of the first time machine so we can look into the future and crack this mystery once and for all, whilst I yawn and wait for the next bar to grow? Na..I shall give that one a pass :D


Quote from galvinlee888:

May be you should use your hundred of million to hire PhD grads to look at TA, so that you can generate hundred of billions ? :D
 
Hey Surf, what's up with this double standard?

Quote from d08:



Basic tactics. When someone agrees with MS, obviously no proof is needed - he could be talking about flying pigs and MS would nod in agreement.

When you disagree, you have to prove it and even if you do, it's never good enough.

 
The true believing fanatics have nothing else to do but resort to personal attacks. it's very obvious, but arguing here is fruitless.

The problem is the very premise of TA is fatally logically flawed. That is why I try to advise others of the facts. If it wasn't logically flawed, I wouldn't have an issue with it. It has nothing to do with my beliefs or anything other than the stupidity of the concept itself as its is used by the gamblers here. surf
 
Quote from sheda:

What, spend that much money so educated people like you can look at a chart and say All I see here is the past! And then propose I invest my money into the creation of the first time machine so we can look into the future and crack this mystery once and for all, whilst I yawn and wait for the next bar to grow? Na..I shall give that one a pass :D

Please do the TA as what you normally do, educated the newbies:
1) Anyone can do TA
2) You only need to attend my education which cost $5K
3) Price is everything, you only look at the chart and price action
4) Setup an account with IB or any bucket shops
5) Fund your account with 5K, wait a minute, you don't have 5K ? then 2K will do the job
4) Pick the high probability setup in your chart and enter your trade
5) Sit back and begin to count your money
6) You can quit your daily job and work freely from your home.
7) Financial freedom !
 
Quote from sheda:

What, spend that much money so educated people like you can look at a chart and say All I see here is the past! And then propose I invest my money into the creation of the first time machine so we can look into the future and crack this mystery once and for all, whilst I yawn and wait for the next bar to grow? Na..I shall give that one a pass :D

What do you see when you look at a chart? The future? LMAO!!

How many moves in one direction increase the odds of of the next move or series being in the same direction or reverse? TA deluded can't even answer this most basic question. Yet they talk stats like its their expertise. Sad.
 
Back
Top