hmm.no edges in the markets

[d08]

Quote from galvinlee888:

I make money in trading, but not TA. I learn the the "real" skills from my previous firm, and none of them using TA. We look at chart but never trade on them.

What I hate most is over years those "TA experts" are bringing false hope to the newbies that TA works without any proof.

Everyone can talk and be the story teller on any chart after the fact. Live call is the only way to proof you speak on what you do. Not empty talk

As I stated earlier, not every method can be shown with "calls". Most profitable people would never reveal trades, there's everything to lose and nothing to gain from that. Convince a pseudonym on a public forum? definitely not worth it.

Also, your claim of "I make money trading", you're full of crap, I'm not seeing any proof - stop giving false hope to the newbies that someone can make money trading. Get it?

 

[sheda]

Quote from galvinlee888:

I make money in trading, but not TA. I learn the the "real" skills from my previous firm, and none of them using TA. We look at chart but never trade on them.

Cool you worked at a firm that taught you a sound method, that's as far as it goes.

What I hate most is over years those "TA experts" are bringing false hope to the newbies that TA works without any proof.

Someone posting a chart with a single ma on followed by a question is classed as a "ta expert"??

Everyone can talk and be the story teller on any chart after the fact. Live call is the only way to proof you speak on what you do. Not empty talk

Live calls from an individual are the only proof of the individuals word in regard to their own trading being true, according to you folks TA is invalid across the board irrespective of the individual, if that's the case you should be able to point the flaws on the chart out that make it impossible to trade, when other people can see valid entry points that were present in the charts development and all you can say is "no..you are just story telling after the chart is complete" your case against is laughable.

 

[Tonkadad]

Quote from galvinlee888:

I agreed. All those "TA expert" have to proof are live calls with consistent profit in certain duration, I don't think I see any so far.

Are you willing to post "live calls with consistent profit (for a) certain duration?"

 

[R. Raskolnikov]

Where did GalvinLee888 go??

 

[jack hershey]

Quote from R. Raskolnikov:

Where did GalvinLee888 go??

He is writing up his non TA skills and working out a plan to make calls all next week.

He will be interleaving his prints as well.

It will be good to see a new non TA method explained on ET.

I remember the days when ET had a chat room and a lot of people poured in and made calls using a variety of systems. Those chats were archived. People trusted the calls and made money right along side the "callers".

Different journals were run in those years to do Q and A and to post charts and logs. Calls were made and prints posted.

Now ET looks more like Denise the Menace. Do these guys have GED's?

It will be fun to see a person doing what he expects of others.

 

[R. Raskolnikov]

That must be it, because it would be hypocritical to demand proof from others via live calls, then claim to be a profitable non TA trader, but then refuse to provide any proof/live calls himself.

I'm glad to hear GalvinLee888 will be providing live calls next week, it's the least he can do, right?

Quote from jack hershey:

He is writing up his non TA skills and working out a plan to make calls all next week.

He will be interleaving his prints as well.

It will be good to see a new non TA method explained on ET.

 

[marketsurfer]

Quote from Tonkadad:

Are you willing to post "live calls with consistent profit (for a) certain duration?"

Marketsurfer has since 2002. All live, all before the fact, and overall profitable---

Folks seem to forget this fact.


surf

 

[marketsurfer]

Quote from galvinlee888:

I make money in trading, but not TA. I learn the the "real" skills from my previous firm, and none of them using TA. We look at chart but never trade on them.

What I hate most is over years those "TA experts" are bringing false hope to the newbies that TA works without any proof.

Everyone can talk and be the story teller on any chart after the fact. Live call is the only way to proof you speak on what you do. Not empty talk

Amen, brother. Nice to see another real professional here.

These jokers popo edges taught by prop firms and spread such nonsense of great success then run whenever challenged.

Welcome,

surf

 

[R. Raskolnikov]

Some guy just tells you he has a "real" method and you believe him without asking for any proof? This doesn't sound like your MO at all

P.S GalvinLee888 ran when challenged FYI.

Quote from marketsurfer:

Amen, brother. Nice to see another real professional here.

These jokers popo edges taught by prop firms and spread such nonsense of great success then run whenever challenged.



Welcome,

surf

 

[galvinlee888]

The "beauty or Scam" of the TA is that you can have two way stories, e.g. when price hit any S/R or channel or anything, you can either long or short (aka reverse or continuous of previous movement), but you can't tell until "after the fact", this is why all the TA guru here only tell the story "after the fact".