hmm.no edges in the markets

Quote from Rodney King:

Uhh, so what do you actually trade -- SPY, ES...? SPX is an index, not a financial instrument.

By the way, are you a partner in Prof's new business "Beacon Logic"?

You use the .SPX chart to place trades into any other derivative of SP500.

No.

Correction: You would have had to use the .SPX chart to trade things like SDS, SSO, SPY, UPRO, SPXU, ES, etc... it's that chart that'll generate the timing for the volume logic gate to open up...but it's too bad that that data isn't available anymore, so this story I've repeatedly emphasized everywhere people have ignored the thread Scottd tried to keep bumping despite my results being reflective to some limited extent of the potential of his methods.

I can't verify what the results are anymore, having not used Wealth Lab Pro since 1/15/2010 which is when I explored using that program to arbitrage the S&P 500.

Fidelity quit carrying that data around June 2012, so ever since then there isn't a source for the codes I have for Cash Cow.
 
Quote from jack hershey:

The RDBMS demands that the ATS be defined.

It is true that I use symbols. For price I have ten symbols. They appear on one sheet and are expressed precisely in Boolean Algebra.

It is true that I use symbols. For volume I have eleven symbols. They appear on one sheet and are expressed precisely in Boolean Algebra.

I do bar by bar analysis. Volume leads price.

As each trend ends, I know before the end that it is arriving.

Three sheets define precisely all the possible ends of trends in markets. These sheets are named PP, A band and B through K band. On the sheets the ends of trends are defined precisely in Boolean Algebra.

The trading fractal I use allows me to take the full offer of the market. To do this I use pairs of EE's found on the three sheets.
the first value is the n- 1 turn the second value is the n turn. All of these combinations are found in one lookup table. This Modrian Table has eight panels whereby the pairs (n -1 and n symbols) are grouped at the top for failsafe or the bottom for routine MADA processes. The panels are divided vertically into four columns, one for each type of trend (each precisely defined.): Set A, B, C, and D.

Thus the complete system of the market operation is precisely defined and as usual in RDBMS an ATS can do the monitoring, analysis, decision Making and Action automatically.

Many people adopt parts of my PEP algoritgm or any part of its three applications.

I hope the above is clear to you. If it isn't then save it and read it every six months. Some day it may become clear to you.


Jack.

No, I dont wish to re-read this every 6 months.
I don't want your method. I have my own, and I'm happy with it.
And to be brutally honest, I'm deeply suspicious of anyone who cannot explain a concept in a few sentences. Experience tells me, it probably doesn't work. Or, is not robust.

More than that, you missed question I asked. And therefore, the point.

Oh, by the way AMAITYAD, I don't think that FJID can ever be MMU. Its as clear as a carrot, on a sunny day in the rain.

Seriously.
 
Quote from Steve Tvardek:

Bwol, I just meant I used it as a starting point or template. From there I used pieces and then added a whole slew of my own precise rules. But yes, I know volume is a big part of his method and I don't use it at all.

Same here.
 
Quote from NoDoji:

Same here.

Don't ignore volume if it's part of a theory as grandiose as Hershey claims.

I'm probably the only one who ever used it properly and saw the returns that appeared maybe somewhat on the level with what the "Cash Cow" 1 pager would be.
 
Quote from jack hershey:

The RDBMS demands that the ATS be defined.

It is true that I use symbols. For price I have ten symbols. They appear on one sheet and are expressed precisely in Boolean Algebra.

It is true that I use symbols. For volume I have eleven symbols. They appear on one sheet and are expressed precisely in Boolean Algebra.

I do bar by bar analysis. Volume leads price.

As each trend ends, I know before the end that it is arriving.

Three sheets define precisely all the possible ends of trends in markets. These sheets are named PP, A band and B through K band. On the sheets the ends of trends are defined precisely in Boolean Algebra.

The trading fractal I use allows me to take the full offer of the market. To do this I use pairs of EE's found on the three sheets.
the first value is the n- 1 turn the second value is the n turn. All of these combinations are found in one lookup table. This Modrian Table has eight panels whereby the pairs (n -1 and n symbols) are grouped at the top for failsafe or the bottom for routine MADA processes. The panels are divided vertically into four columns, one for each type of trend (each precisely defined.): Set A, B, C, and D.

Thus the complete system of the market operation is precisely defined and as usual in RDBMS an ATS can do the monitoring, analysis, decision Making and Action automatically.

Many people adopt parts of my PEP algoritgm or any part of its three applications.

I hope the above is clear to you. If it isn't then save it and read it every six months. Some day it may become clear to you.

Is there a place where one can find pictures of the set A,B,C, and D that you are referring to?
 
Quote from tradingbug:

Is there a place where one can find pictures of the set A,B,C, and D that you are referring to?

So a Modrian table correlation matrix wasn't a question on your mind?

Definitely a bit easier to ask what A, B, C and D are?
 
Quote from NoDoji:

Same here.

Sorry, Nodoji. My point's moot. The volume for my version of his system isn't available any more, so it is not relevant anyway since that code doesn't have the data it needs unless your point was that you just don't look at volume then nm.

Stat arb could ignore volume but trend wise faster rising volume bars demarcate moves more easily from that perspective than the constant volume bars that equalize pricing activity in a physics sense of the term quanta.
 
Quote from tradingbug:

Is there a place where one can find pictures of the set A,B,C, and D that you are referring to?

https://www.elitetrader.com/et/attachments/10-modrain-incomplete-trend-panels-jpg.137367/

https://www.elitetrader.com/et/attachments/11-modrian-complete-trends-panels-jpg.137368/

sorry they are so sloppy; they are from memory.

I have a few not on this set of panels; they occur very rarely in the later bands.

set A is the trend that is c turn to c turn an incomplete trend.

Set B is also incomplete and is c to a to c in turns.

Set C is the normal complete trend. c to a to b to c.

Then there is the drift Set D. It is an even number of turns where the middle is pairs of a to b turns. for example: c to a to b to a to b to a to b to c.

there are onlt three types of turns in markets; they are as follows:

c turn is dom to dom.

a turn is Don to non dom,

b turn is non dom to dom.

to take the full offer I trade c turn to c turn and just hold through the a and b turns.

The panels of the Modrian Table are fun since you know on n -1 turn when the n turn reversal is coming up ahead of time.

drift trends are known are "chop" in CW ese.

As you see here my posts are "haunting" quite a few people. Why don't they keep me on ignore?

All the lookups are in the "contest" thread whose OP is bighog. go to page 2 and look around the middle post on that thread which is in the trading forum.

Today the open was long and the c turn came on bar 4 as a c band pass.

the short that followed was a set C type trend

bars of turns and their EE category were:

7, a, PP3 to 9, b, BM, REV to

12, c Ab, LVBO

Two Seat A tends followed with c/s on the following:

14, c, PP3

15, c BM, ERV.

Then a Set B trend came along:

15

19, a BO, T1 to

21, c, BM, REV

A brief c to c followed and then a drift began.

21

26, c, Ab, LVBO

As youe the days go by quite uneventfully. The c turn reversal simply alternate in sentiment. The SetB is rare but you can visualize that the a to c is the same sentiment.

the Modrian table is used to detect c turns. when the c turn is absent, then this deduction dictates the next type turn has occurred at that EE.

All the math expressions for the whole system are in that post on page 2 of the contest.

It takes about 34 days to have an order of magnitude change in capital without compounding. Sweeping on Fridays works fine. the idle capital just accumlates each week. A half a year takes one from 1,000 to 1,000,000. This means there is little incentive to learn how to use 10 or so lookup tables. In this thread many many people have explained how troublesome it is to use volume.

Systems based on RDBMS are still quite uncommon in the financial industry. The CW mindset prevents a lot of thinking about the very simple finite math system of the market's operation. So few parts and no probabilty and you know one turn before the profit segment that it is coming.

Haunting thing to not be able to grasp any of this. It was fun for me to make up the tables and the precision definitions. It would be fun to revive the ET chat room and run the Dragon typed audio of a GTM session. I thought about running a Dragon created thread of real time calls for the trading forum. BUT ET cannot keep the time stamp very accurate for some reason.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Quote from dev:

Jack
From your writings, I'd automatically assumed you were full of hot air, likely a snake oil vendor. At best, a man who enjoys creating a veil of mystique.

But then you have quite sensible people who say they've investigated the concept, and say there's something in it.

I've probably read 60 or 70 of your posts over time.
From those long waffly posts, I've never been able to grasp what your concept is. Not once.
And ive traded/backtested a lot of concepts over the years, so I'm not exactly ignorant to complicated ideas.

Spyderman? He managed to explain a lot in 1 post.

What's that about?

The annual global meetings were considered a treat by those who attended. I was surprised to read that you have reasons to not bother to attend. Happy you. The list was cut from 700 to 70 last time. Spyderman said he ws a limp noodle after narrating a whole day's trading. furtunately he could hook some webbing around to relax.
 
Back
Top