hmm.no edges in the markets

"... the inventor of continuous fermentation" ?

"
http://www.dbexportbeer.co.nz/History/Morton-his-Inventions

The birth of Continuous Fermentation.
When Morton took over the family brewery, he used the same ingenuity and lateral thinking he’d applied to his inventions. And it wasn’t long before the spanners were out again.

It was here that Morton created the world famous ‘Continuous Fermentation’, a groundbreaking brewing process where raw materials are added to one end of the system and beer is continuously withdrawn from the other – effectively a beer tap that never turns off!

"

"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morton_W._Coutts
Continuous fermentation method

In the 1930s, Coutts investigated the nature of yeast which is the most important ingredient in any brewing. Coutts speculated:

...that yeast could be properly controlled if you looked on it as a human being with a brain. It has so many enzyme mechanisms to call upon to react to whatever is necessary for its survival. Instead of looking on the final product I always took notice of the yeast as an organism that produced whatever you ended up with.

This led him to create the wort stabilisation process, which resulted in a clearer and consistent wort. He then separated the fermentation into stages. In the first stage the yeast grew and in the second the fermentation began. The yeast was thus encouraged to either grow or produce alcohol. As a result Coutts created a continuous flow between the two fermentation processes.
"
 
Quote from OddTrader:

"the inventor of continuous fermentation"?

"
http://www.dbexportbeer.co.nz/History/Morton-his-Inventions

The birth of Continuous Fermentation.
When Morton took over the family brewery, he used the same ingenuity and lateral thinking he’d applied to his inventions. And it wasn’t long before the spanners were out again.

It was here that Morton created the world famous ‘Continuous Fermentation’, a groundbreaking brewing process where raw materials are added to one end of the system and beer is continuously withdrawn from the other – effectively a beer tap that never turns off!

"

"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morton_W._Coutts
Continuous fermentation method

In the 1930s, Coutts investigated the nature of yeast which is the most important ingredient in any brewing. Coutts speculated:

...that yeast could be properly controlled if you looked on it as a human being with a brain. It has so many enzyme mechanisms to call upon to react to whatever is necessary for its survival. Instead of looking on the final product I always took notice of the yeast as an organism that produced whatever you ended up with.

This led him to create the wort stabilisation process, which resulted in a clearer and consistent wort. He then separated the fermentation into stages. In the first stage the yeast grew and in the second the fermentation began. The yeast was thus encouraged to either grow or produce alcohol. As a result Coutts created a continuous flow between the two fermentation processes.
"

Can we all stop confusing this thread with the facts.

I think someone is channeling Forrest Gump.
 
Quote from OddTrader:

"... the inventor of continuous fermentation" ?

"
http://www.dbexportbeer.co.nz/History/Morton-his-Inventions

The birth of Continuous Fermentation.
When Morton took over the family brewery, he used the same ingenuity and lateral thinking he’d applied to his inventions. And it wasn’t long before the spanners were out again.

It was here that Morton created the world famous ‘Continuous Fermentation’, a groundbreaking brewing process where raw materials are added to one end of the system and beer is continuously withdrawn from the other – effectively a beer tap that never turns off!

"

"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morton_W._Coutts
Continuous fermentation method

In the 1930s, Coutts investigated the nature of yeast which is the most important ingredient in any brewing. Coutts speculated:

...that yeast could be properly controlled if you looked on it as a human being with a brain. It has so many enzyme mechanisms to call upon to react to whatever is necessary for its survival. Instead of looking on the final product I always took notice of the yeast as an organism that produced whatever you ended up with.

This led him to create the wort stabilisation process, which resulted in a clearer and consistent wort. He then separated the fermentation into stages. In the first stage the yeast grew and in the second the fermentation began. The yeast was thus encouraged to either grow or produce alcohol. As a result Coutts created a continuous flow between the two fermentation processes.
"

Thank you for your report on the problem of achieving continuous fermentation. Maybe the research is explaining how two different processes are linked.

When they are merged into a single process, then the inovation centers on keeping the yeast growing while simultaneously extracting the product (alcohol). Some key words for your next search may be surfactant and osmosis.
 
Quote from JesseJamesFinn:

Ok, my lucky arbitrage was being in the stock and watching the option market at the same time. I don't care much for stock-options, in 2008 I had Puts on stocks that fell from $5.00 to $1.50 with three months left of Time-Value. I assume you put your contracts for sale at $3.55, $.05 for three months of time, nope, not one contract absorbed! Now the stock is down at $1.35 and they won't fill the order at $3.55, it's in the money by $3.65. Frequently with those "Puts", I was forced to exercise those options and buy the stock long and have a boxed position, which of course messed up, screwed up my buying power for days.


I never got those stock options that traded so weird, that's why I do my best to avoid stock options unless it's a conviction buy. It's a sad situation when you can't sell stock-options below intrinsic value with lots of time too! Why is that, is that why Retail Traders don't have any edge against professional traders?


Night Market, thanks for your help, I am off to bed for a whooping four hours, it's 1:36 and i am done with Zack's, OTC-BB and Pink Sheets, Barcharts and scanning for Thursday.


added! ps. those options (the few i did buy of those puts) the stocks went BK, so i guess I got the last laugh but had to pay the extra money to exercise those options $39.00 extra!

Interesting story!
 
Quote from the bouch:

Examples?

WTS is the first one that comes to mind. I have a friend there making a killing utilizing routing and dark pool access with large block trades for pennies.

There are multiple others, each with its own "teachable" edge.

Traders really have a choice to listen to these unverifiable, TA gurus with past tales of granduer and go down that road, or join a prop firm to learn how its really done today.

surf
 
Quote from marketsurfer:

WTS is the first one that comes to mind. I have a friend there making a killing utilizing routing and dark pool access with large block trades for pennies.

There are multiple others, each with its own "teachable" edge.

Traders really have a choice to listen to these unverifiable, TA gurus with past tales of granduer and go down that road, or join a prop firm to learn how its really done today.

surf

Here are the "teachable" elements:

1. routing,

2. dark pool access, and

3. large block trades for pennies.

Thank God there are no down side expenses to wipe out those pennies or no other better use for that capital.

I'm a verifiable TA trader. Here is my suggestion for proving TA systems work while you make money.

1. Link in to a TA system based MAT operation.

2. Watch (look at it during rth) your linked in account grow as the MAT uses the TA system (be on skype with the operator of the TA system).

3. Add or withdraw funds as required.
 
Quote from jack hershey:

Here are the "teachable" elements:

1. routing,

2. dark pool access, and

3. large block trades for pennies.


Teachable only within the infrastructure and relationships of the prop firm itself. YOU CAN NOT do this on your own. The edge is unavailable to you. This is why the mental masterbation of technical analysis is so weak. These guys will clean your clock because their tech is better then yours. For these folks who say success only comes from years of self teaching. I say total BS. NOOBS, join a good prop firm and learn how to trade. Stop listening to no name Price Action claimed savants who really have no edge.

surf

PS-- maybe some folks can develop the tech and relationships on their own, I should never say never-- but its way too costly when it can be accessed via simply joining a firm.
 
Sorry, this was a funny joke I made on my facebook wall July 27th:
<I>
There are fewer Commodity Trading Advisors (CTA's) in Kentucky than there are Neurosurgeons. I'm 1 of 7 and 1 of the other 7 is in Danville, too! So more than a quarter of the CTA'S in Kentucky live in Danville.
</I>
You all should try to be neurosurgeons in Kentucky. I'm sure then you'll really get to know some mental head cases.

That combine is useless if it doesn't recognize valid statements from a broker, which is more than enough for me to completely ignore marketsurfer for an indeterminable amount of time.
 
Quote from bigsnack:

There are one or two free websites out there on which the site owner uses livestream to show their desktop day after day in real time. Those streams include a chart and a DOM. No gimmicks and no selling of any systems or anything like that, just watch and learn. If someone is searching for that type of affirmation, those outlets are out there to be absorbed.

During my observation of those livestreams, the edge that those traders possess is in their risk management alone. Having enough experience to know when to trade light or when to trade heavy. Scaling out, scaling in, etc.. There is nothing fancy in the TA that I can tell, it really seems to boil down to how they manage their positions.

While I was at PFG they had an iPhone cloud server app called iBroker, and with it every trade I'd make would automatically be tweeted to my feed in a standard recognizable format. (There were many in my symbols not using autotweet and just announcing after the fact stuff the same as is on here).

Paying twitter thousands to get a large following didn't seem worth it, but every time I'd see those trades go off making thousands there wasn't much difference to me between tweeting the trades and letting them get marked on a blotter that you can still pay to view. In the end this did compete with my trading company's exclusive right to publish my results so I stopped doing that but anyone at OpenE-cry can do this if they're so inclined.


About the only pleasurable feedback I got from doing that was one experienced trader noticing that my methods were, to use his description, "quite lethal." And they still are.
 
Quote from koolaid:

this thread has a bunch of noobs trading in their basements yapping back and forth with now real proof of anything.

And others yelling via insinuation at the other to "put up or shut up", all the time...

I'm just sick of it, too! Got any strawberry left over for the rest of us?
 
Back
Top