Quote from marketsurfer:
Good luck, I hope you find something. My experience alone and with my group ( who test these types of things 1000's of times a year) have never found anything worthwhile looking in the direction of TA. surf
To hopeless trader.
this is what my prior post to you signifies regarding using the incorrect logical development in order to get the same wrong answers over and over.
having consistently wrong answers is not usually recognizable. the above poster and his team is celebrating not detecting statistically significance is changin markets and they rejoice because "nothing has changed for them" in a changing scene.
Look at what a comparison of their data with the the U of Chicago data would say. Tthese guys have a low correlation at two points:
2007 to 2008 and 2008 to 2009. Now it is 2013 and they are still fat and happy knowing nothing.
If you use your platform to run on all seven fractals and collect the sentiment curves, see how badly you do compared to a standard academic souce for sentiment.
We can see that there is turnover in HF's; you will see a very high coorolation between HF folding and wrong sentiment coding.
HF's fold because of OPM drain caused by ignorant OPM's. In ecology studies, "fragility" is a player. When cycles are not fulfillable, then the ecology fails. OPM drain is never put into HF strategic planning. WOM causes drain and unexpected insertions of capital. The root catlyst is what MS's team is doing. through his ignorant leadership , he cannot get sentiment correct and he has a house of cards as shown in ET.
If I see anyone on ET who has sentiment correct, hopeless trader, I'll let you know.

