Quote from stu:
Indeed, Hitler and religion was a very bad choice of thread title, especially so, considering how tetchy you get as soon as anyone refers to Hitler or religion.
So tell me, how exactly in your OP do a bunch of photos only depicting groups of Nazis sitting around some dining tables, in which the main claims are completely devoid of any confirmation from the pictures , "give us insight" ?
There are no swastikas visible on any baubles and no swastika on top the tree as is ludicrously described in the text.
"Out of sight at the top of the tree behind Hitler was a swastika instead of an angel,"
Yeah there it is, out of sight!
Truth be known, your OP and the comments you've made subsequent to it are nonsense.
There is nothing to show how "Hitler replaced Christian figures with the Norse Gods", or to "celebrate the season as a holiday of the 'winter solstice', rather than Christmas".
Followed of course by the surreptitious addition that you're scared of liberal absolutists, contradictorily not at all by what they say, but what you imagine by what they say, they might do !
But it's too late for trying to disconnect Hitler from Christian religion. The Roman Catholic Church have never done that, you are not going to be able to.
Canât re-write history either with a few photos that don't do what is claimed on the tin. Attaching at the same time strawmen in the form of disingenuous remarks about economic fascism, and how you are scared of liberal absolutism., simply makes it obvious how you are scared of anything not to the right in politics.
If you want to pull wool over people's eyes, you'll first need at least something resembling wool and even then you'll have a hard job with your line of bad choice topic titles and a very poor version of guilt by false association and some double talk. Methods that "complicated historical figure" Hitler and his Nazi politics would doubtless employ, and look what happened to them.
