History Channel documentary debunks all 9/11 conspiracy theories, 1 by 1

Cognitive Infiltration: An Obama Appointee's Plan to Undermine the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory...........

http://www.amazon.com/Cognitive-Inf...361&linkCode=wey&tag=red08-20&creative=380729

(Olive Branch Press, September 2010), by David Ray Griffin

Griffin’s meritorious effort to raise public awareness and understanding

Former Chicago and Harvard law professor Cass Sunstein, who in 2009 was appointed by President Barack Obama to direct an important executive branch office, had in 2008 co-authored an article containing a plan for the government to prevent the spread of anti-government “conspiracy theories.” Arguing that such theories are believed only by groups suffering from “informational isolation,” he advocated the use of anonymous government agents to engage in “cognitive infiltration” of these groups in order to introduce “cognitive diversity,” with the aim of breaking them up.

Noting that Sunstein’s proposal has evoked condemnations from across the political spectrum–not least because it, being similar to the FBI’s COINTELPRO of the 1960s, would be illegal–David Ray Griffin focuses on the fact that Sunstein’s primary target is the conspiracy theory advocated by the 9/11 Truth Movement. Examining Sunstein’s charge that this theory is both “harmful” and “demonstrably false,” Griffin uses both satire and overwhelming evidence to show that this twofold charge applies instead to what Sunstein calls “the true conspiracy theory” about 9/11-namely, the “theory that Al-Qaeda was responsible for 9/11.”

Cover Reviews:

“David Ray Griffin has written a devastating critique of Cass
Sunstein’s major effort to situate all critics of the official 9/11
story in the garbage pail of ‘conspiracy theory.’ Bringing to bear
his formidable philosophical and theological skills, Griffin
brilliantly illuminates this cognitive/ political concern,
demonstrating that the American people will never find out what
really happened on that fateful day until we as citizens insist on
considering all available evidence with a fresh and open mind.”
—Richard Falk, professor emeritus, Princeton University
 
They may have made off with some cheap steel but whatever was gained by them getting their cheap steel was certainly lost when you and all the other wackos drove the cost of tin through the roof. :D

tin-foil-hat.jpg


Quote from AMT4SWA:

BTW, CHINA (where no Intl reporters could ever have any good access) thanks us for all the cheap steel!!!!!!!!!! :eek:


http://www.china.org.cn/english/2002/Jan/25776.htm

Now who ever came up with shipping the EVIDENCE hastefully off to CHINA was fricking BRILLIANT! What an AWESOME way to make DAMN SURE that steel could NEVER be looked at again.....STONE COLD LOCK! :eek:
More...
 
The 9/11 Commission Report: An Elaborate Fiction


On July 22, 2004, the "National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States" , also known as the "9/11 Commission," published its final Report, the "9/11 Commission Report". The Report became a best-seller and was hailed in the corporate media as the definitive report on the attacks. However, the Report is more accurately characterized as the definitive narrative of the official myth of 9/11. As David Ray Griffin points out in his scholarly book, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, the Report systematically excludes almost every fact that doesn't support the official story. 1

Omissions and Distortions

Most of what we document on this website has been omitted from the Commission Report, particularly the contents of the analysis section. Indeed, the omissions are so numerous they could fill a book, and do -- David Griffin's 339-page Omissions and Distortions. Here we list only some of the more egregious omissions, falsehoods, and contradictions in the Report. In the following we use 'Report' to refer to the entire Report including the Notes section.



*** The Report fails to mention the total collapse of 47-story steel-framed skyscraper Building 7 at 5:20 on the day of the attack. :eek: :eek: :eek:

*** The Report fails to mention the total collapse of 47-story steel-framed skyscraper Building 7 at 5:20 on the day of the attack. :eek: :eek: :eek:

*** The Report fails to mention the total collapse of 47-story steel-framed skyscraper Building 7 at 5:20 on the day of the attack. :eek: :eek: :eek:

http://911research.wtc7.net/post911/commission/report.html
 
Quote from Hello:

They may have made off with some cheap steel but whatever was gained by them getting their cheap steel was certainly lost when you and all the other wackos drove the cost of tin through the roof. :D
More...
It is VERY APPARENT in your many psychologically vacant posts that you have NEVER been formally trained in Asymmetrical Psy Ops Campaigns. THEY are bitch slapping you into cognitive oblivion and they THANK YOU for the lack of intellectual resistance! :eek:
 
Clearly this has something to do with the Jews, who are controlling bin laden, just give him a second to come up with a reason. :D

Quote from phenomena:

So how come bil laden and the wahabists gloat and take credit for 9-11 if they didn't do it?? Do they think that's good publicity??
More...
 
I mean, that's the obvious question to me. If they didn't do it, you'd think that even if they supported it, they would say "hey, great job, but it wasn't us". Why haven't we heard that? Why have we instead heard them taking "credit" for it, and gloating about it? Physics, engineering, and everything else aside. This is the most basic and rational question which for some reason is rarely raised in this debate.

So, naysayers, answer it. Why do al queda and the wahabists openly admit having planned and executed the attack?
 
Yep, and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, admitting to it in the face of the death penalty, he must really love jewish people to sacrifice his life for their cause. :D

CIA agent Michael Scheuer also has a good quote in the documentary where basically he says, in order for you to believe the government was in on 9/11 you would have to believe there wasnt a single decent person in any major area of the government. There would have had to have been 1000's of people involved in all the different areas of this conspiracy theory the truthers have created, and there has never been a single whistle blower from the inside.

Quote from phenomena:

I mean, that's the obvious question to me. If they didn't do it, you'd think that even if they supported it, they would say "hey, great job, but it wasn't us". Why haven't we heard that? Why have we instead heard them taking "credit" for it, and gloating about it? Physics, engineering, and everything else aside. This is the most basic and rational question which for some reason is rarely raised in this debate.

So, naysayers, answer it. Why do al queda and the wahabists openly admit having planned and executed the attack?
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top