It's an excellent video that everyone should see. A cousin of mine, who just left the Air Force after 12 years, is close friends with an OSI officer who was part of the 9/11investigation. My cousin told me that his friend has been very frustrated over the years by all the conspiracy theorists who claimed that 9/11 was never completely or properly investigated or that things were being hidden from the public. The fact is, 9/11 is the most investigated event in the history of the United States. There were comprehensive investigations by the FBI, the Pentagon, the CIA, the New York City Police Department, etc., all of whom shared information. THOUSANDS of investigators and consultants were involved. My cousin's friend was part of a military team that investigated 9/11 for over three years. They know exactly what happened on 9/11. They know who did it, how they did it and they have the engineering specs that explain how and why every building collapsed. In order for there to be a "secret conspiracy," thousands of investigators from the Police, FBI and Military would ALL have to be co-conspirators. Does anybody really believe that thousands of Police officers, FBI agents, military investigators and consultants would ALL agree to be part of such a conspiracy?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
History Channel documentary debunks all 9/11 conspiracy theories, 1 by 1
- Thread starter Hello
- Start date
Russell made an interesting point about human nature but that's about it and he did it with a flawed analogy.
You're actually the one who is "not capable of comprehending even the most rudimentary rules of logic" because, as I said, you missed the point that Russell's teapot is not necessarily unfalsifiable unless it DOES exist. Obviously that went way over your head.
How ironic that your simpleton remark so aptly applies to you.
You're actually the one who is "not capable of comprehending even the most rudimentary rules of logic" because, as I said, you missed the point that Russell's teapot is not necessarily unfalsifiable unless it DOES exist. Obviously that went way over your head.
How ironic that your simpleton remark so aptly applies to you.
Quote from Gayfly1:
If you are not capable of comprehending even the most rudimentary rules of logic, since that was Russell's only point, then I see little point in continuing this discussion. But as a parting thought...
Then what about when a simpleton says something?
And there you have it. It's now official. One by one, Trader666 has essentially declared himself to be smarter than world-renowned philosophers, mathematicians, logicians, geneticists, astrophysicists, theoretical physicists and climate scientists. It doesn't get any better than this. Tell your friends.Quote from Trader666:
Russell ...did it with a flawed analogy...
I don't need to see shows on the history channel to "convince" me that the United States fought in WWII. But I recently saw an episode about WWII and found it very interesting. I don't need to watch NGC to be "convinced" that people climb Mount Everest, but I watched a show about it and found it fascinating. It's not about being "convinced," it's about getting a deeper understanding of the details.
Quote from indahook:
You all actually needed the history channel to convince you those 9/11 theories were complete garbage?
Precious time of your life you wont ever get back... wasted...
Gayfly, Gayfly, Gayfly... you just can't stop misrepresenting things, can you?
I haven't "essentially declared" myself "to be smarter than" any of those people. I made the point that nobody is infallible and took issue with some things "experts" have said that you apparently know you can't debate me on so you distort and twist instead.
For example, my specific point that Russell's teapot is not necessarily unfalsifiable unless it DOES exist. If you were intelligent and honest and you disagreed, you'd call me on it. But you can't so instead you hide your C- brain behind the apron strings of your expert "gods" and play your stupid games.
I haven't "essentially declared" myself "to be smarter than" any of those people. I made the point that nobody is infallible and took issue with some things "experts" have said that you apparently know you can't debate me on so you distort and twist instead.
For example, my specific point that Russell's teapot is not necessarily unfalsifiable unless it DOES exist. If you were intelligent and honest and you disagreed, you'd call me on it. But you can't so instead you hide your C- brain behind the apron strings of your expert "gods" and play your stupid games.
Quote from Gayfly1:
And there you have it. It's now official. One by one, Trader666 has essentially declared himself to be smarter than world-renowned philosophers, mathematicians, logicians, geneticists, astrophysicists, theoretical physicists and climate scientists. It doesn't get any better than this. Tell your friends.
What utter bullshit. You have taken it upon yourself to ridicule or chastise them upon their central themes and/or their very science, which you effectively claim to know better. And not just in one area of expertise, but in all of them. That makes you...special.Quote from Trader666:
...I haven't "essentially declared" myself "to be smarter than" any of those people. I made the point that nobody is infallible and took issue with some things "experts" have said...
Quote from tomdavis:
I don't need to see shows on the history channel to "convince" me that the United States fought in WWII. But I recently saw an episode about WWII and found it very interesting. I don't need to watch NGC to be "convinced" that people climb Mount Everest, but I watched a show about it and found it fascinating. It's not about being "convinced," it's about getting a deeper understanding of the details.
If you need a deeper understanding of 9/11 conspiracies well then I really cant say anything else other than good luck.
It wasn't a deeper understanding of the conspiracies I was looking for. It was a deeper understanding of the events of that day, including the scientific and engineering investigation. My father (now retired) was an architectural engineer for over 40 years and I have an interest in such things.
Quote from indahook:
If you need a deeper understanding of 9/11 conspiracies well then I really cant say anything else other than good luck.