Historical News Articles and FactCheck Agree: Obama is Kenyan-born
- Thread starter jficquette
- Start date
"Want" Biden in the oval office? Of course not. I don't WANT any Socialist Libtard anywhere near political power.
But if Obama is proven ineligible, perhaps there is so much gnashing that the Socialist agenda gets slowed down while we as a country search for the proper thing to do.
To prove what the African writers thinking is can be easy. The birthers or lawyers who look for evidence have to interview ALL the writers. Ask them to explain. IF they think Obama is born in Kenya, ask them what is their proof. IF the writers say they mean (his father) when they say "continent of his birth" that will explain. Easy to prove. [/QUOTE]
Its plain from the articles that they say that he was born in Kenya.
Why is that less credible than the American State Run Media saying he was born in Hawaii?
Lets sit them all down shall we?? Problem with that is no matter what proof they show that he was born in Kenya the "Looney Left " will deny it.
Besides, its obvious he is hiding something. What honest person would not have presented all this personal records during the campaign as all candidates have since the late 60's?
Imagine if McCain held back his records.
John
At least Biden is an American. Actually, he would only be the acting Prez until new elections could be held.
Besides, its obvious he is hiding something. What honest person would not have presented all this personal records during the campaign as all candidates have since the late 60's?
Imagine if McCain held back his records.
John [/QUOTE]
SOMEBODY is giving Obama a free pass on all of this. Any American with half a brain should be asking, "Why?", and "Who?"...
He doesn't have to provide satisfactory proof of eligibility, IN SPITE OF APPARENTLY OBVIOUS QUESTIONABILITY... he doesn't have to provide records and information about his past... even when requested.
What prior presidential candidate would have gotten away with this behavior?
I believe the future of America is at GREAT RISK because of this poser.
Stu, your're not worth the effort. It has been explained ad nauseum about that announcement in the paper.
I like this "birther" argument. It may never be settled but it's a constant reminder that we elected a guy that won't open his records with regard to anything...
I would never vote for somebody that won't open his records because you know somebody a lot more by what they do than what they say. For that matter I would never vote for somebody that wouldn't submit to questions by reporters. All these Democrats look like little kids that don't want to leave mama and go to kindergarten when they either won't go to Fox for a talk or kick and yell like Clinton did... where do we get these "Leaders" we have nowadays? At the Narcissis Rehab Clinic?
I would never vote for somebody that won't open his records because you know somebody a lot more by what they do than what they say. For that matter I would never vote for somebody that wouldn't submit to questions by reporters. All these Democrats look like little kids that don't want to leave mama and go to kindergarten when they either won't go to Fox for a talk or kick and yell like Clinton did... where do we get these "Leaders" we have nowadays? At the Narcissis Rehab Clinic?
Then would you kindly please explain it to me. I haven't yet seen anything that would justify how those publications are in some way false or fraudulent.
A 48 year old public newspaper announcement and the birth record opened and validated.
Will birthers be giving explanations why he wasn't actually born at all next?
many thanks.