Quote from makloda:
They start off like every other child in the country: either they have good, hard-working, loving parents or they don't.
The Grant Study focuses on this issue (http://www.amazon.com/Adaptation-Life-George-E-Vaillant/dp/0674004140) and followed individuals from graduating from Harvard college ("fortunate" by any conventional wisdom) from the early 1940s to their death. Surprisingly, a good portion of these "fortunate" men died as pychopaths, poor alcoholics or criminals. Some committed suicide. Other went to win academic prizes or became millionaires.
Vaillant calls "nest warmth during childhood" the single most important determinant for success and health during adulthood. It is completely independent of the parent's social status. Also, it exposes the futility of any government attempts of fixing social inequality on a federal level through transfer payments or God knows what socialist measures.
Saying that the McAfee guy was just lucky is completely ridiculous. Most likely, he was a hard-working guy with tons of entrepreneurial spirit. Tough to imagine how he could have built the company otherwise.
+1
With McAfee, it's more timing and business intuition and management skills, plus organization, hard work and initiative, that put him in his formerly lofty economic position.
Luck surely played a role, as it usually does, but that role was marginal.
