HILLARY

[futurecurrents]

You are wasting your time with this imbecile.

Yeah B1S2 is even worse than you. Or are you talking about capt oblivious?

 

[Tom B]

Yeah B1S2 is even worse than you. Or are you talking about capt oblivious?

Pajama Boy, what is the ROI on an environmental studies / science degree?

 

[gwb-trading]

Maine publicist Betta Stothart admits to
stealing 40 Trump yard signs in
Washington Post op-ed

I think i've finally got this figured out. Like GWB said the other day, it's not hard to drive around and find many houses with a multitude of democrat signs in their yards, with one notable exception. No Hillary signs. And nobody is complaining about Hillary signs being stolen. So when they see Trump signs everywhere, it galls them, because it's bad optics and it makes them feel bad. Hence, you get people like Betta Stothart.

We have one friend who is a Trump supporter who lives on a main road. He keeps having his Trump signs stolen or damaged.

He now put barbed wire along every edge of the sign. At night the wire is hard to see and anyone pulling the sign is in for a big surprise.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

So the leftards who've spent the last thirty five years deriding Ronald Reagan's supply side economics as a failure have now decided that what he implemented was actually demand side economics. LOL. I've been arguing with nincompoops. Shame on me.

All kidding aside, if you just knew a little bit more, you'd be embarrassed by your posts. (But don't worry; you're safe from that ever happening.)

 

[futurecurrents]

Pajama Boy, what is the ROI on an environmental studies / science degree?

Not all ROI has to do with making more money. I know that's shocker to the righties who generally have no interest in purely intellectual pursuits. They are best at running the store. Simple stuff.

 

[fhl]

All kidding aside, if you just knew a little bit more, you'd be embarrassed by your posts. (But don't worry; you're safe from that ever happening.)

I thought you said you were putting kidding aside.


"At the core of demand side economics is the focus on aggregate demand. Aggregate demand is the combination of consumption of goods, industry investment in capital goods, government spending and net exports. When other elements of aggregate demand are weak, the government can mitigate their impact by increasing its spending. The government can intervene to generate demand for goods and services.

Demand side economists support heavy government spending during a national recession to overcome the short-term low aggregate demand. Raising the market's aggregate demand will reduce unemployment and encourage economic activity, according to this theory. The government increases demand through spending on public goods and services as well as through its control of the money supply through altering interest rates or trading on government-issued bonds."



Read more: What is demand-side economics? | Investopedia http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/040915/what-demandside-economics.asp#ixzz4OKILGX4o



Keynes argued that the solution to the Great Depression was to stimulate the country ("inducement to invest") through some combination of two approaches:

1. A reduction in interest rates (monetary policy), and
2. Government investment in infrastructure (fiscal policy).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics


Fred, you're getting your economics from too many people like Krugman. It has you very confused.

 

[fhl]

One more thing to add to the above.

The left has gotten into the habit of calling tax cuts for the poor a form of demand side economics. But is it?

No.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/oct/13/obama-tax-cut-refunds-those-who-dont-pay/

When you send a check to people who aren't paying taxes and call it a tax cut for the poor rather than gov't spending, it is just an adventure in dishonesty. It is gov't spending. Back to where we started from. Demand side economics is gov't spending. Real tax cuts are supply side economics.

 

[Tom B]

Not all ROI has to do with making more money. I know that's shocker to the righties who generally have no interest in purely intellectual pursuits. They are best at running the store. Simple stuff.

My question is too complicated for you.

 

[Tony Stark]

The tipping point is here. We must not allow Hillary in the White House. Conservative Ted Cruz is the answer but we need to go with we have and that is Donald Trump. As long as he backs off the trade talk (tariffs etc), I am good with him.

Trump is going to lose on Nov 8th but nothing would make me happier in 2020 than your party nominating Cruz.

 

[futurecurrents]

My question is too complicated for you.

Whatever you say Chip.