It's fine for me. I'm in the 10% , but I have wide ranging interests and I travel fairly widely. There are many countries I would be pleased to live in. My philosophy is that if you like where you've been, you'll like where you're going.
HILLARY
- Thread starter Buy1Sell2
- Start date
Yes you're right. It's only 10% ----How could I have been so wrong, what with folks trying to get out of the country right and left.
I was brought up to take care of myself in those areas.
Do not assume that it is not true for others just because it is not true for your lefty entitlement or privileged ilk.
Last edited:
No lie there.
Note that the only thing that the ken starr/Clinton's investigator got on Clinton was perjury for lying about Monica. Note further, that Clinton never even met Monica or had an encounter with her until EIGHTEEEN MONTHS AFTER THE INVESTIGATION HAD BEGUN ON OTHER MATTERS.
Tis the nature of a witchhunt. If you can't find something you just keep going until you do.
That is why it is also risky to do-as many are doing- continually saying that Mueller has the goods on Trump and is flipping everyone everywhere which will result in making his case for obstruction of justice and impeachment- the primary lib goals. He may or may not. It is also true, just as in other investigations, he needs to bring some scalps home especially if he does not get his main target. I say- for example- he already knows based on Trumps note's that they got, that he is not going to get trump on obstruction. Not going to happen. He knows that so now he has to get some other scalps.
That's fine. Let's get a witchhunter going for Hillary and keep that frigging investigation going right through the 2020 elections. Giddy-up. Two or more can play that game. She is getting a little taste of it right now just from the House Committee investigation and she seems kind of pissy- like "how is this happening again, I am special."
Yeh, you be special alright Hillary. And that's why we gonna get you your very own special prosecutor to lock your special arse up.
It is way more than 10% in my view. Because as I said previously the U.S. is a fine place to live if you are economically in the upper ten percent or if you are healthy. You may not have read my entire remark.
Access to routine Healthcare in the U.S. is not a right. Here, access to healthcare, other than "treat and street", is reserved for those who have have money, and/or have an employer that provides health coverage, have dependents, are over 65 and have paid into medicare, or live in a blue State.* There are millions of people who fall into none of these categories. That's a major difference between the U.S. and all other advanced nations. In other nations, access to healthcare is a right. If you are one of the millions who fall outside the above categories and are unfortunate enough to be unhealthy and make too little money to qualify for a health insurance premium supplement,. you will be far better off in any other advanced nation.
The other curious thing about the U.S. way of handling health care is that the nature of the system is such that by death a significant fraction of those of modest, but normally adequate means, will be virtually bankrupt. These people may work hard and save money, but by the time of their death most of their their assets will have been transferred to the medical sector of the economy. There will be little remaining to transfer to heirs.
________________________
*A few red states eventually expanded medicaid, these red States provide access to medical care even for the poor without dependents.
You might be able to help bring this Mueller thing to a speedy conclusion. Just go to this sight and sign the petition.
www.needtoimpeach.com
ha ha ha. The definition is left entirely up to Congress.
Then I assume there would be none. I sure haven't seen any evidence of it. Just not liking someone is not good enough